From: Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
Date: 2008-05-28T17:09:22+09:00
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax

Hi,

In message "Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax"
    on Wed, 28 May 2008 02:33:56 +0900, David Flanagan <david@davidflanagan.com> writes:

|Can we all agree, at least, to limit the scope of the debate at this 
|point to the question of whether the -> syntax should be removed before 
|1.9.1 is released?

Here's the axe.  I have reconsidered {||...} block syntax again this
week, but I still couldn't accept the confusion caused by block
without any prefix.  By the Eric's (other) patch, which is likely to
be merged, plain old lambda could accept optional parameters, so that
-> haters can use lambda's without loosing any ability.

In addition, I don't think I am going to remove -> from 1.9.

							matz.