[#16611] lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
This is one of those e-mails that I know from the start to be futile, =20=
T24gV2VkLCBBcHIgMzAsIDIwMDggYXQgMTE6MjYgUE0sIERhdmUgVGhvbWFzIDxkYXZlQHByYWdw
Hi --
David A. Black wrote:
wouldn't
On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 12:26:47PM +0900, Dave Thomas wrote:
Hi --
David A. Black wrote:
Hi --
David A. Black wrote:
On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 02:02:34AM +0900, David A. Black wrote:
Hi --
Hi --
ara howard wrote:
Hi --
Hi --
Hi --
Not to throw the whole thread into a tizzy again, but why again is:
Evan Phoenix wrote:
Hi,
Hi --
On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 9:49 AM, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org>
Hi,
Hi --
Hi,
Hi,
What about "fn" or "fun", for "function"?
Hi,
Hi,
Hi --
Hi,
Hi --
On Wed, 14 May 2008, David A. Black wrote:
Hi,
how about an uppercase lambda (instead of the usual lowercase one)
Christopher Gill wrote:
Suraj N. Kurapati wrote:
Hi,
Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
Hi,
=20
T24gVGh1LCBNYXkgMjIsIDIwMDggYXQgNTozNyBQTSwgQmVyZ2VyLCBEYW5pZWwgPERhbmllbC5C
RXZlbiB0aG91Z2ggSSBzZWUgdGhlIHVzZWZ1bG5lc3MsIHRoYXQncyBqdXN0IHVnbHkuCgotLUpl
"Jeremy McAnally" <jeremymcanally@gmail.com> wrote on 05/22/2008 05:35:01=20
2008/5/23 <Nate_Wiger@playstation.sony.com>:
I am not sure if that fits to the thread. I have not used yet the more
Tammo Tjarks wrote:
Hi --
> assert_yin_yang -> { q += 0 }, 'it broke!', -> { q == 42 }
Hi --
>> assert_yin_yang proc{ q += 0 }, 'it broke!',
[#16627] Monotonic timeofday() — zimbatm <zimbatm@...>
Hi ruby-core.
[#16642] ruby/trunk rev 16276 broken? ib/erb.rb:429:in `initialize': wrong argument type StringScanner (expected true) (TypeError) — Kurt Stephens <ks@...>
Build crashes shortly after miniruby linkage
[#16648] Uniform RDoc markup — "Jeremy McAnally" <jeremymcanally@...>
Would there be any resistance to making the markup of the RDoc
[#16760] errors running make test — Stephen Bannasch <stephen.bannasch@...>
I updated to revision 16403 and now compiling and running ruby1.9
[#16772] The RubySpec project at rubyspec.org — Brian Ford <brixen@...>
Hi all,
[#16773] Singleton methods on Float and Bignum — Evan Phoenix <evan@...>
In 1.8 (and 1.9 likely), trying to add a singleton method to a Float
Evan Phoenix wrote:
[#16788] Ruby 1.8.7-preview3 has been released — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...>
Folks,
[#16791] GC heap allocation in 1.9 — Sylvain Joyeux <sylvain.joyeux@...4x.org>
While getting the latest of trunk, I stumbled on r16194.
[#16806] nil.instance_eval — ts <decoux@...>
[#16807] Embedding Ruby1.9: seg fault — Masoom <masoom.shaikh@...>
Hi,
Hi,
that means current vm is not embeddable ? by min. src I guess you mean the
Masoom wrote:
[#16812] Proposal: Subject of ruby-core ML article should include artile number — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
Hi,
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 8:20 AM, SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
Luis Lavena wrote:
[#16832] Who is responsible for Ruby license? — "Han, Kimyung" <Kimyung.Han@...>
I am trying to discuss the ruby license with anyone who is responsible
[#16834] Returning duplicate values from Dir.glob — "Vladimir Sizikov" <vsizikov@...>
Hi,
[#16839] ruby autoconf problems — "Michal Suchanek" <hramrach@...>
Hello
[#16864] removal of magical definition of name for some class definition idioms — "Robert Dober" <robert.dober@...>
Dear list
[#16884] block args w/ defaults (was Re: resolving lambda | ambiguity) — "Eric Mahurin" <eric.mahurin@...>
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 4:06 PM, Eric Mahurin <eric.mahurin@gmail.com>
SGV5IQoKSSd2ZSB0cmllZCB5b3VyIHBhdGNoIGFuZCBoYXZlIHNvbWUgdHJvdWJsZXMuCkkgZXhw
[#16886] lambda with normal block syntax — "Eric Mahurin" <eric.mahurin@...>
This patch is an independent but related one to my previous one. It can be
Hi,
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 8:19 PM, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org>
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
Hi,
On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 4:14 PM, Dave Thomas <dave@pragprog.com> wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 5:18 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org>
Hi,
If I may, here are two entries from the ChangeLog file:
Dave Thomas wrote:
Dave Thomas wrote:
Dave Thomas wrote:
On May 27, 2008, at 12:33 PM, David Flanagan wrote:
James Gray wrote:
Dave Thomas wrote:
David Flanagan wrote:
Hi,
On 5/28/08, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 2:31 AM, Eric Mahurin <eric.mahurin@gmail.com> wrote:
[#16921] Major performance degradation on trunk — "Vladimir Sizikov" <vsizikov@...>
Hi,
[#16943] Re: [PATCH] block args w/ defaults (updated) — "Eric Mahurin" <eric.mahurin@...>
MjAwOC81LzI2IFJhZG9zs2F3IEJ1s2F0IDxyYWRlay5idWxhdEBnbWFpbC5jb20+OgoKPiBIZXkh
[#16945] Oniguruma and \p{Greek} — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
Looking at the source, I'd expect the following to work:
[#16951] Ruby 1.9 "exception reentered" — "Paul Boekholt" <p.boekholt@...>
Hi,
2008/5/27, Paul Boekholt <p.boekholt@gmail.com>:
2008/6/6, Paul Boekholt <p.boekholt@gmail.com>:
> 2008/6/6, Paul Boekholt <p.boekholt@gmail.com>:
[#16953] 1.8.6, jemalloc, sock.close problem — Christopher Thompson <cthompson@...>
Warning: This message is probably only peripherally related to Ruby!
I used to catch Errno::EINVAL when using lots of open file descriptors
[#16955] ruby-mode.el copyright assignment — Phil Hagelberg <phil@...>
Hi,
[#16979] Array.nitems replacement? — David Flanagan <david@...>
Array.nitems has just been removed from 1.9, and as near as I can make
[#16984] ZLIB for MSVC 8 - tar_input.rb — "Giancarlo F Bellido" <support@...>
I managed to install wxruby and compile zlib extension using this patch in
On May 28, 2008, at 19:48 PM, Giancarlo F Bellido wrote:
[#17010] unexpected return using define_method — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...>
Is this a bug?
Paul Brannan wrote:
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 06:10:25PM +0900, ts wrote:
Paul Brannan wrote:
[#17028] Ruby 1.8.7 has been released — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...>
Folks,
On Sun, Jun 01, 2008 at 12:25:08AM +0900, Akinori MUSHA wrote:
At Mon, 2 Jun 2008 06:37:21 +0900,
On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 03:46:53PM +0900, Akinori MUSHA wrote:
[#17030] Bytecode handling (compilation) extensions to Ruby 1.9 — Adam Strzelecki <ono@...>
Hello,
Hello again,
Hi,
> to_ary() convert ISeq object to Array and well known objects such as
[PATCH] Monotonic timeofday()
Hi ruby-core.
here I am again, with a new revision of my monotonic patch. I still
hope that one day it will be integrated :)
= Problem
This is a subtle problem that is mostly problematic on long running
processes. If the computer's system clock is set back for a certain
delta, the scheduled threads will wait for that delta time + their
scheduled time before being activated again. This is due to the fact
that they uses the epoch-based gettimeofday() time source.
= Solution
The general solution is to use a monotonic clock because monotonicity
is the guarantee that you won't go back in time. Those clocks are not
epoch-based but it doesn't matter because thread scheduling is only
using deltas of times.
The implemented solution uses the POSIX clock_gettime function, which
has a CLOCK_MONOTONIC flag. clock_gettime(), on most BSD, should be in
the libc. On linux, it is required to link ruby against librt.so,
which is part of the libc6 package. The Darwin (OS X) kernel does not
implement the clock_gettime function. Since clock_gettime() doesn't
guarantee you that your system provides such clock, I also had to add
an init function to check the clock availability, plus the
gettimeofday() fallback.
= Patch
Index: eval.c
===================================================================
--- eval.c (revision 16252)
+++ eval.c (working copy)
@@ -28,6 +28,12 @@
#define EXIT_FAILURE 1
#endif
+#ifdef HAVE_UNISTD_H
+#include <unistd.h>
+#include <time.h>
+#include <errno.h>
+#endif
+
#include <stdio.h>
#include "st.h"
@@ -1340,6 +1346,7 @@
void Init_stack _((VALUE*));
void Init_heap _((void));
void Init_ext _((void));
+void Init_clock _((void));
#ifdef HAVE_NATIVETHREAD
static rb_nativethread_t ruby_thid;
@@ -1382,6 +1389,7 @@
rb_origenviron = environ;
#endif
+ Init_clock();
Init_stack((void*)&state);
Init_heap();
PUSH_SCOPE();
@@ -10245,13 +10253,32 @@
curr_thread->safe = level;
}
+static int clock_monotonic = 0;
+
+void
+Init_clock()
+{
+#ifdef CLOCK_MONOTONIC
+ struct timespec tp;
+ clock_monotonic = (clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, &tp) == 0);
+#endif
+}
+
/* Return the current time as a floating-point number */
static double
timeofday()
{
- struct timeval tv;
- gettimeofday(&tv, NULL);
- return (double)tv.tv_sec + (double)tv.tv_usec * 1e-6;
+ if (clock_monotonic) {
+#ifdef CLOCK_MONOTONIC
+ struct timespec tp;
+ clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, &tp);
+ return (double)tp.tv_sec + (double)tp.tv_nsec * 1e-9;
+#endif
+ } else {
+ struct timeval tv;
+ gettimeofday(&tv, NULL);
+ return (double)tv.tv_sec + (double)tv.tv_usec * 1e-6;
+ }
}
#define STACK(addr) (th->stk_pos<(VALUE*)(addr) &&
(VALUE*)(addr)<th->stk_pos+th->stk_len)
= QA
Q: on what branch is your code based ?
A: I used the ruby_1_8 branch
Q: timeofday() might be used by some code that needs epoch-based time ?
A: I have grep'ed trough the code but might have missed something
Q: is there a similar solution for windows ?
A: I don't know any Windows API that guarantees clock monotonicity.
Q: why didn't you rename timeofday() ?
A: It would hide the purpose of the patch. It is a good idea although.
Q: how do I know if my ruby instance uses the monotonic clock ? (like
I'm running a rails application on a vserver)
A: use "strace" :) . I don't think there is a Scheduled class where I
could publish that information.