[#16611] lambda, ->, haskell, and so on — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
This is one of those e-mails that I know from the start to be futile,
148 messages
2008/05/01
[#16613] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— "Brian Mitchell" <binary42@...>
2008/05/01
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 11:26 PM, Dave Thomas <dave@pragprog.com> wrote:
[#16620] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
2008/05/01
Hi --
[#16631] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>
2008/05/02
David A. Black wrote:
[#16649] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— Marcin Raczkowski <mailing.mr@...>
2008/05/04
wouldn't
[#16661] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...>
2008/05/05
On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 12:26:47PM +0900, Dave Thomas wrote:
[#16662] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
2008/05/05
Hi --
[#16663] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— ts <decoux@...>
2008/05/05
David A. Black wrote:
[#16664] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
2008/05/05
Hi --
[#16665] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— ts <decoux@...>
2008/05/05
David A. Black wrote:
[#16666] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...>
2008/05/05
On Tue, May 06, 2008 at 02:02:34AM +0900, David A. Black wrote:
[#16668] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
2008/05/05
Hi --
[#16682] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— ara howard <ara.t.howard@...>
2008/05/08
[#16684] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— Michael Neumann <mneumann@...>
2008/05/08
ara howard wrote:
[#16687] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
2008/05/08
Hi --
[#16691] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— "ara.t.howard" <ara.t.howard@...>
2008/05/08
[#16692] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
2008/05/08
Hi --
[#16695] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— "ara.t.howard" <ara.t.howard@...>
2008/05/08
[#16696] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
2008/05/08
Hi --
[#16705] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— Evan Phoenix <evan@...>
2008/05/11
Not to throw the whole thread into a tizzy again, but why again is:
[#16707] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— Michael Neumann <mneumann@...>
2008/05/11
Evan Phoenix wrote:
[#16742] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...>
2008/05/12
On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 07:24:07PM +0900, Michael Neumann wrote:
[#16708] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
2008/05/11
Hi,
[#16709] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
2008/05/11
Hi --
[#16710] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— "Eric Mahurin" <eric.mahurin@...>
2008/05/11
On Sun, May 11, 2008 at 9:49 AM, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org>
[#16720] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2008/05/11
Hi,
[#16721] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
2008/05/12
Hi --
[#16722] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2008/05/12
Hi,
[#16723] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— Evan Phoenix <evan@...>
2008/05/12
[#16724] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2008/05/12
Hi,
[#16726] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— Nathan Weizenbaum <nex342@...>
2008/05/12
What about "fn" or "fun", for "function"?
[#16728] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2008/05/12
Hi,
[#16731] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— Evan Phoenix <evan@...>
2008/05/12
[#16732] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2008/05/12
Hi,
[#16733] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— Evan Phoenix <evan@...>
2008/05/12
[#16759] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
2008/05/13
Hi --
[#16766] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2008/05/14
Hi,
[#16784] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
2008/05/18
Hi --
[#16795] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— Nate_Wiger@...
2008/05/19
On Wed, 14 May 2008, David A. Black wrote:
[#16797] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2008/05/19
Hi,
[#16798] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— "Christopher Gill" <gilltots@...>
2008/05/19
how about an uppercase lambda (instead of the usual lowercase one)
[#16802] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— "Suraj N. Kurapati" <sunaku@...>
2008/05/20
Christopher Gill wrote:
[#16843] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— "Suraj N. Kurapati" <sunaku@...>
2008/05/22
Suraj N. Kurapati wrote:
[#16846] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>
2008/05/22
[#16854] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— "=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Rados=B3aw_Bu=B3at?=" <radek.bulat@...>
2008/05/22
On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 5:37 PM, Berger, Daniel <Daniel.Berger@qwest.com> wrote:
[#16857] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— "Jeremy McAnally" <jeremymcanally@...>
2008/05/23
Even though I see the usefulness, that's just ugly.
[#16874] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— Nate_Wiger@...
2008/05/23
"Jeremy McAnally" <jeremymcanally@gmail.com> wrote on 05/22/2008 05:35:01
[#16875] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— "Nikolai Weibull" <now@...>
2008/05/23
2008/5/23 <Nate_Wiger@playstation.sony.com>:
[#16879] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— Tammo Tjarks <tammo@...>
2008/05/24
I am not sure if that fits to the thread. I have not used yet the more
[#16881] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— Phlip <phlip2005@...>
2008/05/24
Tammo Tjarks wrote:
[#16883] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
2008/05/24
Hi --
[#16885] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— Phlip <phlip2005@...>
2008/05/25
> assert_yin_yang -> { q += 0 }, 'it broke!', -> { q == 42 }
[#16887] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— "David A. Black" <dblack@...>
2008/05/25
Hi --
[#16888] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— Phlip <phlip2005@...>
2008/05/25
>> assert_yin_yang proc{ q += 0 }, 'it broke!',
[#16844] Re: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on
— Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
2008/05/22
Hi,
[#16859] Re: resolving lambda | ambiguity (Was: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on)
— "Suraj N. Kurapati" <sunaku@...>
2008/05/23
Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
[#16862] Re: resolving lambda | ambiguity (Was: lambda, ->, haskell, and so on)
— Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
2008/05/23
Hi,
[#16627] Monotonic timeofday() — zimbatm <zimbatm@...>
Hi ruby-core.
4 messages
2008/05/01
[#16642] ruby/trunk rev 16276 broken? ib/erb.rb:429:in `initialize': wrong argument type StringScanner (expected true) (TypeError) — Kurt Stephens <ks@...>
Build crashes shortly after miniruby linkage
4 messages
2008/05/02
[#16648] Uniform RDoc markup — "Jeremy McAnally" <jeremymcanally@...>
Would there be any resistance to making the markup of the RDoc
9 messages
2008/05/04
[#16760] errors running make test — Stephen Bannasch <stephen.bannasch@...>
I updated to revision 16403 and now compiling and running ruby1.9
4 messages
2008/05/13
[#16772] The RubySpec project at rubyspec.org — Brian Ford <brixen@...>
Hi all,
1 message
2008/05/14
[#16773] Singleton methods on Float and Bignum — Evan Phoenix <evan@...>
In 1.8 (and 1.9 likely), trying to add a singleton method to a Float
8 messages
2008/05/15
[#16775] Re: Singleton methods on Float and Bignum
— Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...>
2008/05/15
Evan Phoenix wrote:
[#16788] Ruby 1.8.7-preview3 has been released — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...>
Folks,
3 messages
2008/05/18
[#16791] GC heap allocation in 1.9 — Sylvain Joyeux <sylvain.joyeux@...4x.org>
While getting the latest of trunk, I stumbled on r16194.
5 messages
2008/05/19
[#16806] nil.instance_eval — ts <decoux@...>
4 messages
2008/05/20
[#16807] Embedding Ruby1.9: seg fault — Masoom <masoom.shaikh@...>
Hi,
10 messages
2008/05/20
[#16809] Re: [ruby-core:16807] Embedding Ruby1.9: seg fault
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2008/05/20
Hi,
[#16816] Re: [ruby-core:16807] Embedding Ruby1.9: seg fault
— Masoom <masoom.shaikh@...>
2008/05/20
that means current vm is not embeddable ? by min. src I guess you mean the
[#16817] Re: [ruby-core:16807] Embedding Ruby1.9: seg fault
— ts <decoux@...>
2008/05/20
Masoom wrote:
[#16812] Proposal: Subject of ruby-core ML article should include artile number — SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
Hi,
8 messages
2008/05/20
[#16820] Re: Proposal: Subject of ruby-core ML article should include artile number
— "Luis Lavena" <luislavena@...>
2008/05/20
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 8:20 AM, SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
[#16822] Re: Proposal: Subject of ruby-core ML article should include artile number
— Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...>
2008/05/20
Luis Lavena wrote:
[#16832] Who is responsible for Ruby license? — "Han, Kimyung" <Kimyung.Han@...>
I am trying to discuss the ruby license with anyone who is responsible
6 messages
2008/05/21
[#16833] Re: [URGENT] Who is responsible for Ruby license?
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2008/05/21
Hi,
[#16834] Returning duplicate values from Dir.glob — "Vladimir Sizikov" <vsizikov@...>
Hi,
7 messages
2008/05/21
[#16839] ruby autoconf problems — "Michal Suchanek" <hramrach@...>
Hello
6 messages
2008/05/22
[#16845] Re: ruby autoconf problems
— Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
2008/05/22
Hi,
[#16864] removal of magical definition of name for some class definition idioms — "Robert Dober" <robert.dober@...>
Dear list
5 messages
2008/05/23
[#16884] block args w/ defaults (was Re: resolving lambda | ambiguity) — "Eric Mahurin" <eric.mahurin@...>
On Sat, May 24, 2008 at 4:06 PM, Eric Mahurin <eric.mahurin@gmail.com>
4 messages
2008/05/24
[#16925] Re: [PATCH] block args w/ defaults (was Re: resolving lambda | ambiguity)
— "=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Rados=B3aw_Bu=B3at?=" <radek.bulat@...>
2008/05/26
Hey!
[#16886] lambda with normal block syntax — "Eric Mahurin" <eric.mahurin@...>
This patch is an independent but related one to my previous one. It can be
64 messages
2008/05/25
[#16960] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax
— "Eric Mahurin" <eric.mahurin@...>
2008/05/28
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 2:31 AM, Eric Mahurin <eric.mahurin@gmail.com> wrote:
[#16895] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax
— Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
2008/05/26
Hi,
[#16900] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax
— "Eric Mahurin" <eric.mahurin@...>
2008/05/26
On Sun, May 25, 2008 at 8:19 PM, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org>
[#16901] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2008/05/26
Hi,
[#16902] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax
— "Suraj N. Kurapati" <sunaku@...>
2008/05/26
Hi,
[#16903] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2008/05/26
Hi,
[#16904] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax
— Dave Thomas <dave@...>
2008/05/26
[#16905] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2008/05/26
Hi,
[#16907] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax
— Dave Thomas <dave@...>
2008/05/26
[#16912] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2008/05/26
Hi,
[#16920] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax
— David Flanagan <david@...>
2008/05/26
If I may, here are two entries from the ChangeLog file:
[#16922] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax
— Dave Thomas <dave@...>
2008/05/26
[#16927] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax
— David Flanagan <david@...>
2008/05/26
Dave Thomas wrote:
[#16928] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax
— Dave Thomas <dave@...>
2008/05/26
[#16929] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax
— David Flanagan <david@...>
2008/05/26
Dave Thomas wrote:
[#16931] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax
— Dave Thomas <dave@...>
2008/05/27
[#16946] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax
— David Flanagan <david@...>
2008/05/27
Dave Thomas wrote:
[#16947] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax
— James Gray <james@...>
2008/05/27
On May 27, 2008, at 12:33 PM, David Flanagan wrote:
[#16949] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax
— David Flanagan <david@...>
2008/05/27
James Gray wrote:
[#16954] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax
— Dave Thomas <dave@...>
2008/05/27
[#16956] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax
— David Flanagan <david@...>
2008/05/27
Dave Thomas wrote:
[#16961] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax
— "Suraj N. Kurapati" <sunaku@...>
2008/05/28
David Flanagan wrote:
[#16967] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2008/05/28
Hi,
[#16971] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax
— "Eric Mahurin" <eric.mahurin@...>
2008/05/28
On 5/28/08, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#16990] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2008/05/29
Hi,
[#16908] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax
— "Meinrad Recheis" <meinrad.recheis@...>
2008/05/26
On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 4:14 PM, Dave Thomas <dave@pragprog.com> wrote:
[#16910] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax
— Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
2008/05/26
Hi,
[#16911] Re: [PATCH] lambda with normal block syntax
— "Meinrad Recheis" <meinrad.recheis@...>
2008/05/26
On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 5:18 PM, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org>
[#16921] Major performance degradation on trunk — "Vladimir Sizikov" <vsizikov@...>
Hi,
5 messages
2008/05/26
[#16943] Re: [PATCH] block args w/ defaults (updated) — "Eric Mahurin" <eric.mahurin@...>
2008/5/26 Rados梶w Buウat <radek.bulat@gmail.com>:
5 messages
2008/05/27
[#16945] Oniguruma and \p{Greek} — Dave Thomas <dave@...>
Looking at the source, I'd expect the following to work:
9 messages
2008/05/27
[#16951] Ruby 1.9 "exception reentered" — "Paul Boekholt" <p.boekholt@...>
Hi,
8 messages
2008/05/27
[#17133] Re: Ruby 1.9 "exception reentered"
— "Paul Boekholt" <p.boekholt@...>
2008/06/06
2008/5/27, Paul Boekholt <p.boekholt@gmail.com>:
[#17199] Re: Ruby 1.9 "exception reentered"
— "Paul Boekholt" <p.boekholt@...>
2008/06/10
2008/6/6, Paul Boekholt <p.boekholt@gmail.com>:
[#17227] Re: Ruby 1.9 "exception reentered"
— "Paul Boekholt" <p.boekholt@...>
2008/06/11
> 2008/6/6, Paul Boekholt <p.boekholt@gmail.com>:
[#16953] 1.8.6, jemalloc, sock.close problem — Christopher Thompson <cthompson@...>
Warning: This message is probably only peripherally related to Ruby!
8 messages
2008/05/27
[#16970] Re: 1.8.6, jemalloc, sock.close problem
— "Roger Pack" <rogerpack2005@...>
2008/05/28
I used to catch Errno::EINVAL when using lots of open file descriptors
[#16955] ruby-mode.el copyright assignment — Phil Hagelberg <phil@...>
6 messages
2008/05/27
[#17022] Re: ruby-mode.el copyright assignment
— Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@...>
2008/05/31
Hi,
[#16979] Array.nitems replacement? — David Flanagan <david@...>
Array.nitems has just been removed from 1.9, and as near as I can make
8 messages
2008/05/28
[#16984] ZLIB for MSVC 8 - tar_input.rb — "Giancarlo F Bellido" <support@...>
I managed to install wxruby and compile zlib extension using this patch in
5 messages
2008/05/29
[#16986] Re: [PATCH] ZLIB for MSVC 8 - tar_input.rb
— Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>
2008/05/29
On May 28, 2008, at 19:48 PM, Giancarlo F Bellido wrote:
[#17010] unexpected return using define_method — Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...>
Is this a bug?
8 messages
2008/05/30
[#17012] Re: unexpected return using define_method
— ts <decoux@...>
2008/05/30
Paul Brannan wrote:
[#17014] Re: unexpected return using define_method
— Paul Brannan <pbrannan@...>
2008/05/30
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 06:10:25PM +0900, ts wrote:
[#17015] Re: unexpected return using define_method
— ts <decoux@...>
2008/05/30
Paul Brannan wrote:
[#17028] Ruby 1.8.7 has been released — "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...>
Folks,
10 messages
2008/05/31
[#17033] Ruby 1.8.7: ERB is broken
— "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...>
2008/06/01
On Sun, Jun 01, 2008 at 12:25:08AM +0900, Akinori MUSHA wrote:
[#17042] Re: Ruby 1.8.7: ERB is broken
— "Akinori MUSHA" <knu@...>
2008/06/02
At Mon, 2 Jun 2008 06:37:21 +0900,
[#17044] Re: Ruby 1.8.7: ERB is broken
— "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill@...>
2008/06/02
On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 03:46:53PM +0900, Akinori MUSHA wrote:
[#17030] Bytecode handling (compilation) extensions to Ruby 1.9 — Adam Strzelecki <ono@...>
Hello,
8 messages
2008/05/31
[#17119] Re: Bytecode handling (compilation) extensions to Ruby 1.9
— Adam Strzelecki <ono@...>
2008/06/05
Hello again,
[#17121] Re: Bytecode handling (compilation) extensions to Ruby 1.9
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2008/06/05
Hi,
[#17122] Re: Bytecode handling (compilation) extensions to Ruby 1.9
— Adam Strzelecki <ono@...>
2008/06/05
> to_ary() convert ISeq object to Array and well known objects such as
Re: Ruby 1.8.7-preview3 has been released
From:
"=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Rados=B3aw_Bu=B3at?=" <radek.bulat@...>
Date:
2008-05-19 11:18:28 UTC
List:
ruby-core #16793
I've tried latest version from 1.8 branch (revision r16479) and running rails in production mode ends with "Segmentation fault" after 1-5 requests. Below it's full message: *** glibc detected *** ruby1.8: free(): invalid pointer: 0x00000000019d76e0 *** ======= Backtrace: ========= /lib/libc.so.6[0x7f3c3661d08a] /lib/libc.so.6(cfree+0x8c)[0x7f3c36620c1c] ruby1.8[0x43a0cb] ruby1.8(ruby_xmalloc+0x6e)[0x43a98e] ruby1.8(ruby_xcalloc+0x1d)[0x43ac4d] ruby1.8(st_init_table+0x3e)[0x49779e] ruby1.8(rb_hash_new+0x56)[0x43cd96] ruby1.8[0x41a3da] ruby1.8[0x41e2bb] ruby1.8[0x421e8b] ruby1.8[0x42241f] ruby1.8[0x41aa0d] ruby1.8[0x41a17d] ruby1.8[0x421e8b] ruby1.8[0x42241f] ruby1.8[0x41aa0d] ruby1.8[0x41bc19] ruby1.8[0x421e8b] ruby1.8[0x42241f] ruby1.8[0x41aa0d] ruby1.8[0x421e8b] ruby1.8[0x42241f] ruby1.8[0x41aa0d] ruby1.8[0x41db72] ruby1.8[0x421e8b] ruby1.8[0x42241f] ruby1.8[0x41aa0d] ruby1.8[0x421e8b] ruby1.8[0x42241f] ruby1.8[0x41a8c1] ruby1.8[0x41d4a3] ruby1.8[0x421e8b] ruby1.8[0x42241f] ruby1.8[0x41aa0d] ruby1.8[0x426d31] ruby1.8[0x41c950] ruby1.8[0x41a17d] ruby1.8[0x41fdf3] ruby1.8[0x41a4a5] ruby1.8[0x421e8b] ruby1.8[0x42241f] ruby1.8[0x41a8c1] ruby1.8[0x41e5ab] ruby1.8[0x41a7bb] ruby1.8[0x41b042] ruby1.8[0x421e8b] ruby1.8[0x42241f] ruby1.8[0x41aa0d] ruby1.8[0x426d31] ruby1.8[0x41c950] ruby1.8[0x421e8b] ruby1.8[0x42241f] ruby1.8[0x41a1e2] ruby1.8[0x421e8b] ruby1.8[0x42241f] ruby1.8[0x42c967] ruby1.8[0x421f73] ruby1.8[0x42241f] ruby1.8[0x41aa0d] ruby1.8[0x421e8b] ruby1.8[0x42241f] ruby1.8[0x41a1e2] ruby1.8[0x421e8b] ======= Memory map: ======== 00400000-0050e000 r-xp 00000000 08:06 8601608 /home/radarek/language-shootout/build/bin/ruby1.8 0070d000-0070f000 rw-p 0010d000 08:06 8601608 /home/radarek/language-shootout/build/bin/ruby1.8 0070f000-01e04000 rw-p 0070f000 00:00 0 [heap] 7f3c2c000000-7f3c2c021000 rw-p 7f3c2c000000 00:00 0 7f3c2c021000-7f3c30000000 ---p 7f3c2c021000 00:00 0 7f3c30ebd000-7f3c30eca000 r-xp 00000000 08:06 6045828 /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 7f3c30eca000-7f3c310ca000 ---p 0000d000 08:06 6045828 /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 7f3c310ca000-7f3c310cb000 rw-p 0000d000 08:06 6045828 /lib/libgcc_s.so.1 7f3c310cb000-7f3c310d5000 r-xp 00000000 08:06 6045995 /lib/libnss_files-2.7.so 7f3c310d5000-7f3c312d5000 ---p 0000a000 08:06 6045995 /lib/libnss_files-2.7.so 7f3c312d5000-7f3c312d7000 rw-p 0000a000 08:06 6045995 /lib/libnss_files-2.7.so 7f3c312d7000-7f3c312ed000 r-xp 00000000 08:06 6045992 /lib/libnsl-2.7.so 7f3c312ed000-7f3c314ec000 ---p 00016000 08:06 6045992 /lib/libnsl-2.7.so 7f3c314ec000-7f3c314ee000 rw-p 00015000 08:06 6045992 /lib/libnsl-2.7.so 7f3c314ee000-7f3c314f0000 rw-p 7f3c314ee000 00:00 0 7f3c314f0000-7f3c31506000 r-xp 00000000 08:06 6046121 /lib/libpthread-2.7.so 7f3c31506000-7f3c31706000 ---p 00016000 08:06 6046121 /lib/libpthread-2.7.so 7f3c31706000-7f3c31708000 rw-p 00016000 08:06 6046121 /lib/libpthread-2.7.so 7f3c31708000-7f3c3170c000 rw-p 7f3c31708000 00:00 0 7f3c3170c000-7f3c318c5000 r-xp 00000000 08:06 10455292 /usr/lib/libmysqlclient.so.15.0.0 7f3c318c5000-7f3c31ac5000 ---p 001b9000 08:06 10455292 /usr/lib/libmysqlclient.so.15.0.0 7f3c31ac5000-7f3c31b0e000 rw-p 001b9000 08:06 10455292 /usr/lib/libmysqlclient.so.15.0.0 7f3c31b0e000-7f3c31b0f000 rw-p 7f3c31b0e000 00:00 0 7f3c31b0f000-7f3c31b22000 r-xp 00000000 08:06 11207037 /home/radarek/language-shootout/build/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/mysql-2.7/lib/mysql.so 7f3c31b22000-7f3c31d22000 ---p 00013000 08:06 11207037 /home/radarek/language-shootout/build/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/mysql-2.7/lib/mysql.so 7f3c31d22000-7f3c31d23000 rw-p 00013000 08:06 11207037 /home/radarek/language-shootout/build/lib/ruby/gems/1.8/gems/mysql-2.7/lib/mysql.so 7f3c31d23000-7f3c31d24000 r-xp 00000000 08:06 426051 /home/radarek/language-shootout/build/lib/ruby/1.8/x86_64-linux/digest/sha1.so 7f3c31d24000-7f3c31f23000 ---p 00001000 08:06 426051 /home/radarek/language-shootout/build/lib/ruby/1.8/x86_64-linux/digest/sha1.so 7f3c31f23000-7f3c31f24000 rw-p 00000000 08:06 426051 /home/radarek/language-shootout/build/lib/ruby/1.8/x86_64-linux/digest/sha1.so 7f3c31f24000-7f3c32c1e000 rw-p 7f3c31Aborted -- Rados梶w Buウat http://radarek.jogger.pl - m blog