[#392128] negative grep — Matt Lawrence <matt@...>

A bit of syntax that I have never picked up. How do I use grep to exclude

14 messages 2012/01/12
[#392129] Re: negative grep — K Clair <kclair@...> 2012/01/12

biglist !~ /bar/

[#392135] Problem with "Exception" - suddenly stopped working — Panagiotis Atmatzidis <ml@...>

Hello,

16 messages 2012/01/12
[#392144] Re: Problem with "Exception" - suddenly stopped working — "Abinoam Jr." <abinoam@...> 2012/01/12

IMHO ~PERHAPS~ the begin rescue is not working because the exception

[#392146] Re: Problem with "Exception" - suddenly stopped working — Peter Vandenabeele <peter@...> 2012/01/12

On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 10:04 PM, Abinoam Jr. <abinoam@gmail.com> wrote:

[#392147] Re: Problem with "Exception" - suddenly stopped working — Peter Vandenabeele <peter@...> 2012/01/12

On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 10:33 PM, Peter Vandenabeele <peter@vandenabeele.com

[#392154] Re: Problem with "Exception" - suddenly stopped working — Panagiotis Atmatzidis <ml@...> 2012/01/12

Hello,

[#392161] Re: Problem with "Exception" - suddenly stopped working — "Abinoam Jr." <abinoam@...> 2012/01/13

On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 8:45 PM, Panagiotis Atmatzidis

[#392162] Re: Problem with "Exception" - suddenly stopped working — Peter Vandenabeele <peter@...> 2012/01/13

On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 12:23 PM, Abinoam Jr. <abinoam@gmail.com> wrote:

[#392242] The Better Code — Intransition <transfire@...>

Which would you judge to be the better code?

15 messages 2012/01/16

[#392252] Which library to write a parser — thomas carlier <carlier.thomas@...>

Hi,

16 messages 2012/01/16

[#392262] uniq with count; better way? — Ralph Shnelvar <ralphs@...32.com>

a = [4,5,6,4,5,6,6,7]

42 messages 2012/01/16
[#392266] Re: uniq with count; better way? — Sigurd <cu9ypd@...> 2012/01/16

The first that came to my mind.

[#392268] Re: uniq with count; better way? — Adam Prescott <adam@...> 2012/01/16

On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 16:00, Sigurd <cu9ypd@gmail.com> wrote:

[#392277] Re: uniq with count; better way? — Magnus Holm <judofyr@...> 2012/01/16

On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 17:04, Adam Prescott <adam@aprescott.com> wrote:

[#392287] Re: uniq with count; better way? — "Abinoam Jr." <abinoam@...> 2012/01/17

On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 1:48 PM, Magnus Holm <judofyr@gmail.com> wrote:

[#392289] Re: uniq with count; better way? — "Abinoam Jr." <abinoam@...> 2012/01/17

On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 9:22 PM, Abinoam Jr. <abinoam@gmail.com> wrote:

[#392291] Re: uniq with count; better way? — "Abinoam Jr." <abinoam@...> 2012/01/17

On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 10:05 PM, Abinoam Jr. <abinoam@gmail.com> wrote:

[#392303] Re: uniq with count; better way? — Peter Vandenabeele <peter@...> 2012/01/17

On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 2:44 AM, Abinoam Jr. <abinoam@gmail.com> wrote:

[#392351] Re: uniq with count; better way? — Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...> 2012/01/18

On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Peter Vandenabeele

[#392286] Parsing log with date time entry — Christopher Graves <gravescl@...>

The log file looks like this

24 messages 2012/01/16

[#392406] Name directory with a variable — Alex Sweps <alexszepes@...>

Hello again everyone.

14 messages 2012/01/20

[#392429] Getting an Object to Push or Register "Itself" With a Hash During Initialization — Frank Guerino <frank.guerino@...4it.com>

Hi,

11 messages 2012/01/20

[#392460] Microrant on Ruy's Math Skills — Intransition <transfire@...>

So simple...

116 messages 2012/01/21
[#392464] Re: Microrant on Ruy's Math Skills — Gary Wright <gwtmp01@...> 2012/01/21

[#392469] Re: Microrant on Ruy's Math Skills — Yossef Mendelssohn <ymendel@...> 2012/01/21

On Jan 21, 2012 9:34 AM, "Gary Wright" <gwtmp01@mac.com> wrote:

[#392471] Re: Microrant on Ruy's Math Skills — Su Zhang <su.comp.lang.ruby@...> 2012/01/21

On 1/21/2012 12:08 PM, Yossef Mendelssohn wrote:

[#392499] Re: Microrant on Ruy's Math Skills — Intransition <transfire@...> 2012/01/22

So they can drop a billion transistors on a chip, have implemented 3D

[#392547] Re: Microrant on Ruy's Math Skills — Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...> 2012/01/23

On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 3:03 AM, Intransition <transfire@gmail.com> wrote:

[#392550] Re: Microrant on Ruy's Math Skills — Peter Vandenabeele <peter@...> 2012/01/23

On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 9:29 AM, Robert Klemme

[#392579] Re: Microrant on Ruy's Math Skills — Chad Perrin <code@...> 2012/01/23

On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 07:33:20PM +0900, Peter Vandenabeele wrote:

[#392581] Re: Microrant on Ruy's Math Skills — Steve Klabnik <steve@...> 2012/01/23

> Even that and the '1.1'.to_dec option mentioned elsewhere seem pretty

[#392585] Re: Microrant on Ruy's Math Skills — Chad Perrin <code@...> 2012/01/23

On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 03:14:27AM +0900, Steve Klabnik wrote:

[#392587] Re: Microrant on Ruy's Math Skills — Steve Klabnik <steve@...> 2012/01/23

No, it's not a terminology difference. That's why it won't work. You

[#392590] Re: Microrant on Ruy's Math Skills — Chad Perrin <code@...> 2012/01/23

On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 05:45:18AM +0900, Steve Klabnik wrote:

[#392591] Re: Microrant on Ruy's Math Skills — Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...> 2012/01/23

[#392618] Re: Microrant on Ruy's Math Skills — Alex Chaffee <alexch@...> 2012/01/24

"Standard is better than better." -Anon.

[#392643] Re: Microrant on Ruy's Math Skills — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2012/01/25

On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 6:05 AM, Alex Chaffee <alexch@gmail.com> wrote:

[#392673] Re: Microrant on Ruy's Math Skills — Intransition <transfire@...> 2012/01/25

I have tried this, but recently discovered the same issues arise.

[#392743] Re: Microrant on Ruy's Math Skills — Garthy D <garthy_lmkltybr@...> 2012/01/27

[#392745] Re: Microrant on Ruy's Math Skills — Josh Cheek <josh.cheek@...> 2012/01/27

On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 6:05 PM, Garthy D <

[#392766] Re: Microrant on Ruy's Math Skills — Adam Prescott <adam@...> 2012/01/27

On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 03:05, Josh Cheek <josh.cheek@gmail.com> wrote:

[#392776] Re: Microrant on Ruy's Math Skills — Chad Perrin <code@...> 2012/01/27

On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 11:02:52PM +0900, Adam Prescott wrote:

[#392781] Re: Microrant on Ruy's Math Skills — Gary Wright <gwtmp01@...> 2012/01/27

[#392805] Re: Microrant on Ruy's Math Skills — "Jon Lambert" <jlambert@...> 2012/01/29

On Jan 27, 2012, at 3:26 PM, Gary Wright wrote:

[#392831] Re: Microrant on Ruy's Math Skills — Gary Wright <gwtmp01@...> 2012/01/30

[#392835] Re: Microrant on Ruy's Math Skills — Chad Perrin <code@...> 2012/01/30

On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 10:03:04AM +0900, Gary Wright wrote:

[#392837] Re: Microrant on Ruy's Math Skills — Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...> 2012/01/30

On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 6:56 AM, Chad Perrin <code@apotheon.net> wrote:

[#392847] Re: Microrant on Ruy's Math Skills — Chad Perrin <code@...> 2012/01/30

On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 05:22:47PM +0900, Robert Klemme wrote:

[#392511] Building desktop application using Ruby and any GUI Framework — Rubyist Rohit <passionate_programmer@...>

I want to write a small desktop application on Ruby. I want the

12 messages 2012/01/22

[#392598] Web Application from Scratch - like PHP — "Gaurav C." <chande.gaurav@...>

Hi,

17 messages 2012/01/24

[#392635] A little assistance please :) — Paet Worlds II <paetilium@...>

So I'm still quite new to Ruby and so far I love it's simplicity, but I

21 messages 2012/01/25
[#392636] Re: A little assistance please :) — Hilco Wijbenga <hilco.wijbenga@...> 2012/01/25

On 24 January 2012 17:14, Paet Worlds II <paetilium@live.com> wrote:

[#392637] Re: A little assistance please :) — Paet Worlds II <paetilium@...> 2012/01/25

Hilco Wijbenga wrote in post #1042399:

[#392641] Re: A little assistance please :) — Chad Perrin <code@...> 2012/01/25

On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 10:41:10AM +0900, Paet Worlds II wrote:

[#392672] Re: A little assistance please :) — Dave Aronson <rubytalk2dave@...> 2012/01/25

On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 23:32, Chad Perrin <code@apotheon.net> wrote:

[#392711] Re: A little assistance please :) — Chad Perrin <code@...> 2012/01/26

On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 03:43:59AM +0900, Dave Aronson wrote:

[#392818] Help please Undefined Method error — "andres d." <andres.1996.1@...>

Hi and thank you for reading this

12 messages 2012/01/29

[#392867] Multiple assignment in conditional — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...>

I find this a strange Ruby error.

28 messages 2012/01/31
[#392868] Re: Multiple assignment in conditional — Josh Cheek <josh.cheek@...> 2012/01/31

On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 12:46 AM, Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@gmail.com>wrote:

[#392944] Re: Multiple assignment in conditional — Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@...> 2012/02/01

On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 6:22 PM, Josh Cheek <josh.cheek@gmail.com> wrote:

[#392914] Re: Multiple assignment in conditional — Robert Klemme <shortcutter@...> 2012/01/31

On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 7:46 AM, Gavin Sinclair <gsinclair@gmail.com> wrote=

[#392917] PHP vs Ruby is it worth it? — Samuel Mensah <sasogeek@...>

Hi, I've been searching around for what the best language there is out

14 messages 2012/01/31

Re: New to programming, my first program!

From: Dave Aronson <rubytalk2dave@...>
Date: 2012-01-10 21:31:49 UTC
List: ruby-talk #392098
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 07:51, Luke D. <crazybuzz100@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Ruby world!

Hi Luke!

> Just thought I'd post my first Ruby program and say hi.

Well done!  I like your use of meaningful variable names (something
beginners usually haven't learned yet), and you've picked up nicely
some of the Ruby idioms (like .times) that some people have trouble
with, when they come from languages that don't have such things.
(Most don't.)

> This is my first stab at making a program of any use to me, quite
> exciting!

Yup, it's amazing how useful even a short program can be.  That's one
of the reasons for the success of "scripting" languages like Ruby.
You can do awesome things in even just one line, that can save a
system administrator hours of typing to do something manually.

> If anyone has some suggestions (features, simplify code, bad commenting
> etc.) it would be good if I knew now before I delved deeper into the
> Ruby world!

The only thing I'd mention that someone else hasn't, is the indentation.

First, the Ruby community seems to prefer less indentation.  You've
used tabs, which in most contexts will expand to 4, 5, or 8 spaces.
We usually use 2.  But that's just a matter of taste and convention,
not anything you've done wrong!  I used to be in the habit of using
tabs myself, both so it was clearer and to discourage too-deep
nesting.  (It also took up less disk space and transmission time, back
when those were expensive.)

Second, I see you've indented the entire "if" block an extra level.
You may find that keeping the indentation consistent helps you figure
out how many levels deep you are in the control flow (i.e., within
things like times, if, while, and so on).  Luckily, the Ruby community
also seems to prefer shorter methods, so such confusion will be rare,
but still, consistency will help anyone trying to understand your
code.  (Having a care for the next poor sod to have to look at your
code has been one of my major points over the past couple decades, and
I was very glad to see that the Ruby community places such high
emphasis on clean and readable code.)

> The program asks the user how many notes he wants to sing, then randomly
> chooses those notes from a hash. The idea is that the user then sings
> the Sol-fa presented to them on the screen.

I was wondering: why does it print "doh" before the random notes?  Is
that as sort of a "baseline" so that someone listening, who might not
have perfect pitch, can still at least judge the interval?

> (I assume I posted this in the right place?)

Yup!

-- 
Dave Aronson, President, Dave Aronson Software Engineering and Training
Ruby on Rails Freelancing (Northern Virginia, Washington DC, or Remote)
DaveAronson.com, Codosaur.us, Dare2XL.com, & RecruitingRants.com (NEW!)
Specialization is for insects. (Heinlein) - Have Pun, Will Babble! (me)

In This Thread