From: Adam Prescott <adam@...>
Date: 2012-01-17T01:14:26+09:00
Subject: Re: uniq with count; better way?

--f46d044468e10c53a204b6a782ab
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Jan 16, 2012 4:09 PM, "Sigurd" <cu9ypd@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> You example is not accurate though:
>
> 5 +  [1, 2, 3, 4].reduce(&:+)
>

In what sense is that more "accurate"?

--f46d044468e10c53a204b6a782ab--