From: Adam Prescott Date: 2012-01-18T06:51:03+09:00 Subject: Re: uniq with count; better way? --e89a8f5038b6a628c104b6c053e9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 21:29, Joel VanderWerf wrote: > It's a reasonable suggestion. > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/**Histogram > : > Hm! I haven't heard that use before. Still, would that be well-understood? If most people think of it as the visual representation of the frequency, the method name might seem off. But thanks for pointing that one out. :) --e89a8f5038b6a628c104b6c053e9--