From: Peter Vandenabeele <peter@...>
Date: 2012-01-19T06:25:09+09:00
Subject: Re: uniq with count; better way?

--00235429cbb8ec399c04b6d41461
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 9:26 PM, Ralph Shnelvar <ralphs@dos32.com> wrote:

>
> PV> The initial "Ralph Shneiver" algorithm is least affected.
>
> It's Shenlvar not Shnelver!   :-)
>

Very sorry for that ... This is the second time on short notice
that I err with names :-/


I am going to paste in stuff from another post for the reader's
> convenience.  I am quoting AJ
>
> AJ> n = 100_000
> AJ> Benchmark.bm(15) do |b|
> AJ>   b.report("Ralph Shneiver:") { n.times { a = [4,5,6,4,5,6,6,7];
>

I am afraid the misreading of your name started here ...

Peter

--00235429cbb8ec399c04b6d41461--