From: Ryan Davis <ryand-ruby@...>
Date: 2012-01-29T17:18:50+09:00
Subject: Re: A little assistance please :)


On Jan 27, 2012, at 10:43 , Chad Perrin wrote:

> On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 06:31:38PM +0900, Gunther Diemant wrote:
>>> You're right, that's much better -- apart from the fact I have yet to
>>> come up with a single good reason for dynamic class names.
>> 
>> Test cases in a dsl test language like MiniTest/Spec or RSpec
>> 
>> describe "Foo" do
>> end
>> #=> Class FooTest < MiniTest::TestCase
> 
> Why is that better than storing unnamed classes in a hash with keys for
> the "names" instead of actually, dynamically assigning names to new
> hashes?

<ass owner="chad">
  <pitchfork>
    <torch>
      Your question makes no sense as worded. I can't even guess at the intent.
    </torch>
  </pitchfork>
</ass>

P.S. I tried to do the above in yaml and it just didn't feel as funny. Close tags make things funnier.