From: Sigurd <cu9ypd@...>
Date: 2012-01-17T01:09:28+09:00
Subject: Re: uniq with count; better way?

Well it's one of the possible solutions. 
You example is not accurate though:

5 +  [1, 2, 3, 4].reduce(&:+) 

On Jan 16, 2012, at 6:04 PM, Adam Prescott wrote:

> On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 16:00, Sigurd <cu9ypd@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> [4,5,6,4,5,6,6,7].inject(Hash.new(0)) {|res, x| res[x] += 1; res }
>> 
> 
> I think this is a misuse of inject, personally, every time I see it. It's
> harder to read and it doesn't give the feeling of actually "reducing"
> (inject's alias) the array down to one thing. The required `; res` is a
> sign of that. Compare:
> 
> [1, 2, 3, 4].inject(5) { |a, b| a + b }