From: Chad Perrin <code@...>
Date: 2012-01-30T05:10:18+09:00
Subject: Re: A little assistance please :)

On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 05:18:50PM +0900, Ryan Davis wrote:
> 
> On Jan 27, 2012, at 10:43 , Chad Perrin wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 06:31:38PM +0900, Gunther Diemant wrote:
> >>> You're right, that's much better -- apart from the fact I have yet to
> >>> come up with a single good reason for dynamic class names.
> >> 
> >> Test cases in a dsl test language like MiniTest/Spec or RSpec
> >> 
> >> describe "Foo" do
> >> end
> >> #=> Class FooTest < MiniTest::TestCase
> > 
> > Why is that better than storing unnamed classes in a hash with keys for
> > the "names" instead of actually, dynamically assigning names to new
> > hashes?
> 
> <ass owner="chad">
>   <pitchfork>
>     <torch>
>       Your question makes no sense as worded. I can't even guess at the intent.
>     </torch>
>   </pitchfork>
> </ass>
> 
> P.S. I tried to do the above in yaml and it just didn't feel as funny. Close tags make things funnier.

So . . . you are not only a trollish jackass, but also deficient in your
understanding of English.  Thanks for the update.

-- 
Chad Perrin [ original content licensed OWL: http://owl.apotheon.org ]