From: "Abinoam Jr." <abinoam@...>
Date: 2012-01-20T00:59:23+09:00
Subject: Re: uniq with count; better way?

On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 6:25 PM, Peter Vandenabeele
<peter@vandenabeele.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 9:26 PM, Ralph Shnelvar <ralphs@dos32.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> PV> The initial "Ralph Shneiver" algorithm is least affected.
>>
>> It's Shenlvar not Shnelver!   :-)
>>
>
> Very sorry for that ... This is the second time on short notice
> that I err with names :-/
>
>
> I am going to paste in stuff from another post for the reader's
>> convenience.  I am quoting AJ
>>
>> AJ> n = 100_000
>> AJ> Benchmark.bm(15) do |b|
>> AJ>   b.report("Ralph Shneiver:") { n.times { a = [4,5,6,4,5,6,6,7];
>>
>
> I am afraid the misreading of your name started here ...
>
> Peter

Sorry Ralph Shenlvar!