[#1026] Is this a bug? — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
18 messages
2000/01/03
[#1053] rand() / drand48() — ts <decoux@...>
11 messages
2000/01/05
[#1055] Re: rand() / drand48()
— matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
2000/01/05
[#1061] Re: rand() / drand48()
— gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro)
2000/01/07
Hi,
[#1067] Here docs not skipping leading spaces — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
5 messages
2000/01/08
[#1083] YADQ (Yet Another Dumb Question) — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
12 messages
2000/01/10
[#1084] Infinite loop — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
17 messages
2000/01/11
[#1104] The value of while... — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
24 messages
2000/01/11
[#1114] Re: The value of while...
— Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
2000/01/12
matz@netlab.co.jp (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:
[#1128] Re: The value of while... — David Suarez de Lis <excalibor@...>
Hi all,
1 message
2000/01/12
[#1133] Re: Class variables... — David Suarez de Lis <excalibor@...>
Hi there,
2 messages
2000/01/12
[#1158] Is this expected behavior? — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
6 messages
2000/01/21
[#1172] Re: Possible bug in ruby-man-1.4 — Huayin Wang <wang@...>
> |Well, I guess it comes down to what you mean by an integer
10 messages
2000/01/24
[#1177] Re: Possible bug in ruby-man-1.4
— Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
2000/01/25
matz@netlab.co.jp (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:
[#1188] Enumerable and index — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
5 messages
2000/01/27
[#1193] Semantics of chomp/chop — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
7 messages
2000/01/28
[#1197] Question about 'open' — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
8 messages
2000/01/30
[ruby-talk:01134] Re: Class variables...
From:
Clemens Hintze <clemens.hintze@...>
Date:
2000-01-12 17:00:13 UTC
List:
ruby-talk #1134
David Suarez de Lis writes: > Hi there, > > matz wrote: > > Ruby does not have the class variables (yet). > > [...] > I thought Capital case identifiers were constants... Unless > Population is a constant Array of 1 value, but the value inside the > array is variable... ? Your are right. The variable is a constant. That means the content of the variable. All variables in Ruby contain references to a certain object (ok, almost all ;-). You cannot assign a new value (means reference) to the variable, but you could, of course, send a message to the referenced instance to modify itself. [...] > I see, interesting although a bit complicated (according with \cle's > examples...) does this add a new object to a program (or, better > said, a new object per object we create)? Yes and no, it depends on what you are doing! You have to assign a Proc instance to the 'define_finalizer' method. In your simple example (only decrementing 'Population') we could reuse the same Proc instance ever and ever again. But as I pass the name of the Person to the Proc instance, it is necessary to create a new finalizer instance with every new Person instance. First it has also disturbes me, but after a while I have found, that I need this feature *very* seldom (only once in all my scripts written so far [except for samples like yours, of course] ;-) [...] > Thanks, nice work with the language, > d@ \cle [...]