[#1026] Is this a bug? — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
18 messages
2000/01/03
[#1053] rand() / drand48() — ts <decoux@...>
11 messages
2000/01/05
[#1055] Re: rand() / drand48()
— matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
2000/01/05
[#1061] Re: rand() / drand48()
— gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro)
2000/01/07
Hi,
[#1067] Here docs not skipping leading spaces — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
5 messages
2000/01/08
[#1083] YADQ (Yet Another Dumb Question) — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
12 messages
2000/01/10
[#1084] Infinite loop — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
17 messages
2000/01/11
[#1104] The value of while... — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
24 messages
2000/01/11
[#1114] Re: The value of while...
— Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
2000/01/12
matz@netlab.co.jp (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:
[#1128] Re: The value of while... — David Suarez de Lis <excalibor@...>
Hi all,
1 message
2000/01/12
[#1133] Re: Class variables... — David Suarez de Lis <excalibor@...>
Hi there,
2 messages
2000/01/12
[#1158] Is this expected behavior? — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
6 messages
2000/01/21
[#1172] Re: Possible bug in ruby-man-1.4 — Huayin Wang <wang@...>
> |Well, I guess it comes down to what you mean by an integer
10 messages
2000/01/24
[#1177] Re: Possible bug in ruby-man-1.4
— Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
2000/01/25
matz@netlab.co.jp (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:
[#1188] Enumerable and index — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
5 messages
2000/01/27
[#1193] Semantics of chomp/chop — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
7 messages
2000/01/28
[#1197] Question about 'open' — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
8 messages
2000/01/30
[ruby-talk:01115] Re: Infinite loop
From:
matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
Date:
2000-01-12 06:16:48 UTC
List:
ruby-talk #1115
Hi,
In message "[ruby-talk:01113] Re: Infinite loop"
on 00/01/12, ts <decoux@moulon.inra.fr> writes:
|Y> * a.hash == b.hash where a.eql?(b) is true.
|
| I've not understood, sorry. Do you mean
|
| 1) if a.eql?(b) then a.hash == b.hash
|
| or
|
| 2) if a.hash == b.hash then a.eql?(b) is true
The former, i.e. forall a and b satisfy a.eql?(b), a.hash and b.hash
should have same values. But if a.hash and b.hash have same hash
values, a.eql?(b) may not be true.
| This don't work for the first case with [1, 2, [1, 2]] and [1, 2, [1, 2]]
Yes, you are right. I must think more deeply about how to get hash
values for arrays. sigh.
matz.