[#1026] Is this a bug? — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
18 messages
2000/01/03
[#1053] rand() / drand48() — ts <decoux@...>
11 messages
2000/01/05
[#1055] Re: rand() / drand48()
— matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
2000/01/05
[#1061] Re: rand() / drand48()
— gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro)
2000/01/07
Hi,
[#1067] Here docs not skipping leading spaces — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
5 messages
2000/01/08
[#1083] YADQ (Yet Another Dumb Question) — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
12 messages
2000/01/10
[#1084] Infinite loop — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
17 messages
2000/01/11
[#1104] The value of while... — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
24 messages
2000/01/11
[#1114] Re: The value of while...
— Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
2000/01/12
matz@netlab.co.jp (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:
[#1128] Re: The value of while... — David Suarez de Lis <excalibor@...>
Hi all,
1 message
2000/01/12
[#1133] Re: Class variables... — David Suarez de Lis <excalibor@...>
Hi there,
2 messages
2000/01/12
[#1158] Is this expected behavior? — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
6 messages
2000/01/21
[#1172] Re: Possible bug in ruby-man-1.4 — Huayin Wang <wang@...>
> |Well, I guess it comes down to what you mean by an integer
10 messages
2000/01/24
[#1177] Re: Possible bug in ruby-man-1.4
— Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
2000/01/25
matz@netlab.co.jp (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:
[#1188] Enumerable and index — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
5 messages
2000/01/27
[#1193] Semantics of chomp/chop — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
7 messages
2000/01/28
[#1197] Question about 'open' — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
8 messages
2000/01/30
[ruby-talk:01103] Re: Infinite loop
From:
Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
Date:
2000-01-11 16:23:08 UTC
List:
ruby-talk #1103
Clemens Hintze <clemens.hintze@alcatel.de> writes: > > a1 = ["hello", 2, "world"] > a2 = ["world", 2, "hello"] > a1.hash == a2.hash # Broken! > a1.hash > 417265 > a2.hash > 416997 > > With old implementation, it was possible as both calculated hash > numbers was equal! Furthemore I consider this behavior as inconsistent > regarding the example you have shown above. THe reason it's not inconsistent is that Matz seeded the hash with self.id. In my example, I was careful to reuse the original object, so self never changed, and hence the hashes were the same. I strikes be as dangerous having two arrays that happen to have the same elements hash to the same value. I could see a lot of bugs arising if you then used these arrays as keys in a hash: salary[['david', 'thomas']] = 10000 salary[['thomas', 'david']] = 90000 Bad news! Dave