ruby-talk

Mailing Lists

ruby-list (For Ruby users, JA) ruby-dev (For Ruby developers, JA) ruby-core (For Ruby developers, EN) ruby-talk (For Ruby users, EN)
2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002 2001 2000 1999 1998
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

[#1024] Tracing attributes — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

2 messages 2000/01/03
[#1025] Re: Tracing attributes — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/01/03

Hi,

[#1026] Is this a bug? — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

18 messages 2000/01/03
[#1037] Re: Is this a bug? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/01/03

Hi,
[#1040] Re: Is this a bug? — Yasushi Shoji <yashi@...> 2000/01/03

hi,
[#1045] Re: Is this a bug? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/01/03

Hi,
[#1043] Re: Is this a bug? — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 2000/01/03

Hi,
[#1039] Re: Is this a bug? — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/01/03

matz@netlab.co.jp (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:
[#1028] Re: Is this a bug? — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 2000/01/03

Hi,
[#1029] Re: Is this a bug? — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/01/03

gotoken@math.sci.hokudai.ac.jp (GOTO Kentaro) writes:
[#1030] Re: Is this a bug? — ts <decoux@...> 2000/01/03

>>>>> "D" == Dave Thomas <Dave@thomases.com> writes:
[#1032] Re: Is this a bug? — ts <decoux@...> 2000/01/03

>>>>> "t" == ts <decoux@moulon.inra.fr> writes:
[#1031] Re: Is this a bug? — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 2000/01/03

Hi,
[#1033] Re: Is this a bug? — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/01/03

gotoken@math.sci.hokudai.ac.jp (GOTO Kentaro) writes:
[#1041] Re: Is this a bug? — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/01/03

Yasushi Shoji <yashi@yashi.com> writes:
[#1035] Re: Is this a bug? — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 2000/01/03

Hi,
[#1034] Re: Is this a bug? — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/01/03

Dave Thomas <Dave@thomases.com> writes:
[#1042] Re: Is this a bug? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/01/03

Hi,
[#1036] Re: Is this a bug? — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/01/03

gotoken@math.sci.hokudai.ac.jp (GOTO Kentaro) writes:
[#1038] Re: Is this a bug? — Yasushi Shoji <yashi@...> 2000/01/03

hi,

[#1027] 8 bit characters - the plot thickens — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

1 message 2000/01/03

[#1044] en <-> ja translation site — Yasushi Shoji <yashi@...>

hi,

1 message 2000/01/03

[#1046] Equivalent of 'inject' — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

2 messages 2000/01/04
[#1047] Re: Equivalent of 'inject' — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/01/04

Hi,

[#1048] Extract args from binding? — Andrew Hunt <andy@...>

2 messages 2000/01/04
[#1049] Re: Extract args from binding? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/01/04

Hi,

[#1050] Upper case method names — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

3 messages 2000/01/04
[#1051] Re: Upper case method names — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/01/04

Hi,
[#1052] Re: Upper case method names — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 2000/01/04

Hi,

[#1053] rand() / drand48() — ts <decoux@...>

11 messages 2000/01/05
[#1055] Re: rand() / drand48() — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/01/05

[#1078] Re: rand() / drand48() — Katsuyuki Komatsu <komatsu@...> 2000/01/10

In the message of [ruby-talk:01055] Re: rand() / drand48()
[#1081] Re: rand() / drand48() — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/01/10

Hi,
[#1061] Re: rand() / drand48() — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 2000/01/07

Hi,
[#1063] Re: rand() / drand48() — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/01/07

[#1068] Re: rand() / drand48() — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 2000/01/08

Hi,
[#1073] Re: rand() / drand48() — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/01/08

Hi,
[#1074] Re: rand() / drand48() — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 2000/01/08

Hi,
[#1075] Re: rand() / drand48() — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/01/08

[#1076] Re: rand() / drand48() — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 2000/01/09

In message "[ruby-talk:01075] Re: rand() / drand48()"

[#1054] .. — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

4 messages 2000/01/05
[#1056] Re: .. — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/01/05

Hi,
[#1057] Re: .. — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/01/05

matz@netlab.co.jp (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:
[#1058] Re: .. — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/01/05

[#1059] Locales and codesets — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

3 messages 2000/01/06
[#1060] Re: Locales and codesets — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/01/06

[#1062] Re: Locales and codesets — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 2000/01/07

In message "[ruby-talk:01060] Re: Locales and codesets"

[#1064] Re: rand() / drand48() — Andrew Hunt <andy@...>

> * drand48() requires srand48() before calling it. So we have to

2 messages 2000/01/07
[#1065] Re: rand() / drand48() — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/01/07

[#1066] Forward: Re: Re: rand() / drand48() — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)

I've received a personal reply from Andy. I'm forwarding it for

1 message 2000/01/07

[#1067] Here docs not skipping leading spaces — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

5 messages 2000/01/08
[#1069] Re: Here docs not skipping leading spaces — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/01/08

Hi,
[#1070] Re: Here docs not skipping leading spaces — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/01/08

matz@netlab.co.jp (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:
[#1071] Re: Here docs not skipping leading spaces — Yasushi Shoji <yashi@...> 2000/01/08

From: Dave Thomas <Dave@thomases.com>
[#1072] Re: Here docs not skipping leading spaces — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/01/08

Yasushi Shoji <yashi@yashi.com> writes:

[#1077] [[:alpha:]] and its friends — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

4 messages 2000/01/09
[#1079] Re: [[:alpha:]] and its friends — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/01/10

Hi,
[#1080] Re: [[:alpha:]] and its friends — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/01/10

matz@netlab.co.jp (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:
[#1082] Re: [[:alpha:]] and its friends — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/01/10

[#1083] YADQ (Yet Another Dumb Question) — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

12 messages 2000/01/10
[#1085] Re: YADQ (Yet Another Dumb Question) — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 2000/01/11

Hi,
[#1096] Re: YADQ (Yet Another Dumb Question) — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/01/11

Hi,
[#1110] Re: YADQ (Yet Another Dumb Question) — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/01/12

matz@netlab.co.jp (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:
[#1111] Re: YADQ (Yet Another Dumb Question) — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/01/12

Hi,
[#1086] Re: YADQ (Yet Another Dumb Question) — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/01/11

gotoken@math.sci.hokudai.ac.jp (GOTO Kentaro) writes:
[#1097] Re: YADQ (Yet Another Dumb Question) — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/01/11

Hi,
[#1093] Re: YADQ (Yet Another Dumb Question) — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/01/11

Hi,
[#1094] Re: YADQ (Yet Another Dumb Question) — Clemens Hintze <clemens.hintze@...> 2000/01/11

Yukihiro Matsumoto writes:
[#1095] Re: YADQ (Yet Another Dumb Question) — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/01/11

matz@netlab.co.jp (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:
[#1109] Re: YADQ (Yet Another Dumb Question) — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/01/12

[#1099] Re: YADQ (Yet Another Dumb Question) — Yasushi Shoji <yashi@...> 2000/01/11

From: Dave Thomas <Dave@thomases.com>

[#1084] Infinite loop — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

17 messages 2000/01/11
[#1116] Re: Infinite loop — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/01/12

ts <decoux@moulon.inra.fr> writes:
[#1087] Re: Infinite loop — Yasushi Shoji <yashi@...> 2000/01/11

From: Dave Thomas <Dave@thomases.com>
[#1088] Re: Infinite loop — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...> 2000/01/11

Hello yashi,
[#1089] Re: Infinite loop — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/01/11

Yasushi Shoji <yashi@yashi.com> writes:
[#1091] Re: Infinite loop — Yasushi Shoji <yashi@...> 2000/01/11

From: Dave Thomas <Dave@thomases.com>
[#1090] Re: Infinite loop — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/01/11

Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@gmx.net> writes:
[#1092] Re: Infinite loop — Clemens Hintze <clemens.hintze@...> 2000/01/11

Dave Thomas writes:
[#1098] Re: Infinite loop — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/01/11

Hi,
[#1100] Re: Infinite loop — Clemens Hintze <clemens.hintze@...> 2000/01/11

Yukihiro Matsumoto writes:
[#1101] Re: Infinite loop — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/01/11

matz@netlab.co.jp (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:
[#1102] Re: Infinite loop — Clemens Hintze <clemens.hintze@...> 2000/01/11

Dave Thomas writes:
[#1105] Re: Infinite loop — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/01/11

Hi,
[#1113] Re: Infinite loop — ts <decoux@...> 2000/01/12

>>>>> "Y" == Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@netlab.co.jp> writes:
[#1115] Re: Infinite loop — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/01/12

Hi,
[#1103] Re: Infinite loop — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/01/11

Clemens Hintze <clemens.hintze@alcatel.de> writes:
[#1106] Re: Infinite loop — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/01/11

[#1104] The value of while... — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

24 messages 2000/01/11
[#1114] Re: The value of while... — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/01/12

matz@netlab.co.jp (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:
[#1117] Re: The value of while... — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/01/12

[#1119] Re: The value of while... — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...> 2000/01/12

Yukihiro Matsumoto writes:
[#1120] Re: The value of while... — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/01/12

[#1121] Re: The value of while... — Clemens Hintze <clemens.hintze@...> 2000/01/12

Yukihiro Matsumoto writes:
[#1123] Re: The value of while... — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/01/12

Hi,
[#1124] Re: The value of while... — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/01/12

matz@netlab.co.jp (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:
[#1108] Re: The value of while... — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/01/12

matz@netlab.co.jp (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:
[#1112] Re: The value of while... — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/01/12

Hi,
[#1107] Re: The value of while... — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/01/11

[#1118] Re: The value of while... — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/01/12

matz@netlab.co.jp (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:
[#1122] Re: The value of while... — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/01/12

matz@netlab.co.jp (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:
[#1126] Re: The value of while... — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/01/12

Hi,
[#1131] Re: The value of while... — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/01/12

matz@netlab.co.jp (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:
[#1136] Re: The value of while... — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/01/13

Hi,
[#1138] Re: The value of while... — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/01/13

matz@netlab.co.jp (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:
[#1145] Re: The value of while... — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/01/15

Hi,
[#1146] Re: The value of while... — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/01/15

matz@netlab.co.jp (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:
[#1150] Re: The value of while... — "Conrad Schneiker" <schneiker@...> 2000/01/16

From: Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@netlab.co.jp>
[#1152] Re: The value of while... — Clemens Hintze <c.hintze@...> 2000/01/17

Hi,
[#1153] Re: The value of while... — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/01/17

Hi,
[#1154] Re: The value of while... — Clemens Hintze <clemens.hintze@...> 2000/01/17

Yukihiro Matsumoto writes:
[#1155] Toward better English doc's. (Re: Re: The value of while...) — SuHi <manamist@...> 2000/01/17

Hi,

[#1125] Class variables... — David Suarez de Lis <excalibor@...>

Hi all,

4 messages 2000/01/12
[#1127] Re: Class variables... — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/01/12

Hi,
[#1130] Re: Class variables... — Clemens Hintze <clemens.hintze@...> 2000/01/12

Yukihiro Matsumoto writes:
[#1129] Class variables... — Clemens Hintze <clemens.hintze@...> 2000/01/12

David Suarez de Lis writes:

[#1128] Re: The value of while... — David Suarez de Lis <excalibor@...>

Hi all,

1 message 2000/01/12

[#1132] Re: The value of while... — David Suarez de Lis <excalibor@...>

Hi!,

1 message 2000/01/12

[#1133] Re: Class variables... — David Suarez de Lis <excalibor@...>

Hi there,

2 messages 2000/01/12
[#1134] Re: Class variables... — Clemens Hintze <clemens.hintze@...> 2000/01/12

David Suarez de Lis writes:

[#1135] Factory of classes — David Suarez de Lis <excalibor@...>

Hi all,

3 messages 2000/01/13
[#1137] Re: Factory of classes — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/01/13

Hi,
[#1156] Re: Factory of classes — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/01/18

[#1139] Bug in String — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

3 messages 2000/01/13
[#1140] Re: Bug in String — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/01/14

Hi,
[#1141] Re: Bug in String — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/01/14

matz@netlab.co.jp (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:

[#1142] Continuations... — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

3 messages 2000/01/15
[#1143] Re: Continuations... — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/01/15

Hi,
[#1144] Re: Continuations... — ts <decoux@...> 2000/01/15

>>>>> "D" == Dave Thomas <Dave@thomases.com> writes:

[#1147] struct / freeze — ts <decoux@...>

4 messages 2000/01/16
[#1148] Re: struct / freeze — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/01/16

Hi,
[#1149] Re: struct / freeze — ts <decoux@...> 2000/01/16

>>>>> "Y" == Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@netlab.co.jp> writes:
[#1151] Re: struct / freeze — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/01/17

Hi,

[#1157] [岩舌] Welcome to our (ruby-talk ML) You are added automatically — "PENWIZ" <PENWIZ@...>

# guide

1 message 2000/01/19

[#1158] Is this expected behavior? — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

6 messages 2000/01/21
[#1166] Re: Is this expected behavior? — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/01/23

matz@netlab.co.jp (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:
[#1159] Re: Is this expected behavior? — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/01/21

Dave Thomas <Dave@thomases.com> writes:
[#1160] Re: Is this expected behavior? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/01/22

Hi,
[#1161] Re: Is this expected behavior? — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/01/22

matz@netlab.co.jp (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:
[#1165] Re: Is this expected behavior? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/01/23

Hi,

[#1162] Possible bug in ruby-man-1.4 — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

4 messages 2000/01/22
[#1167] Re: Possible bug in ruby-man-1.4 — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/01/23

[#1168] Re: Possible bug in ruby-man-1.4 — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/01/24

matz@netlab.co.jp (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:
[#1171] Re: Possible bug in ruby-man-1.4 — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/01/24

Hi,

[#1163] Pack options — Andrew Hunt <andy@...>

2 messages 2000/01/22
[#1164] Re: Pack options — Minero Aoki <aamine@...> 2000/01/22

Hi,

[#1169] undef_method vs. remove_method — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

2 messages 2000/01/24
[#1170] Re: undef_method vs. remove_method — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/01/24

Hi,

[#1172] Re: Possible bug in ruby-man-1.4 — Huayin Wang <wang@...>

> |Well, I guess it comes down to what you mean by an integer

10 messages 2000/01/24
[#1173] Re: Possible bug in ruby-man-1.4 — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/01/24

Huayin Wang <wang@rjka.com> writes:
[#1176] Re: Possible bug in ruby-man-1.4 — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/01/25

Hi,
[#1177] Re: Possible bug in ruby-man-1.4 — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/01/25

matz@netlab.co.jp (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:
[#1178] Re: Possible bug in ruby-man-1.4 — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/01/25

In message "[ruby-talk:01177] Re: Possible bug in ruby-man-1.4"
[#1180] Re: Possible bug in ruby-man-1.4 — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/01/25

Hi,
[#1184] Re: Possible bug in ruby-man-1.4 — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 2000/01/25

Hi,
[#1179] Re: Possible bug in ruby-man-1.4 — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/01/25

matz@netlab.co.jp (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:
[#1182] Re: Possible bug in ruby-man-1.4 — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/01/25

[#1181] Re: Possible bug in ruby-man-1.4 — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/01/25

Dave Thomas <Dave@thomases.com> writes:

[#1174] == and eql? — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

2 messages 2000/01/24
[#1175] Re: == and eql? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/01/25

[#1183] removing tainting — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

2 messages 2000/01/25
[#1185] Re: removing tainting — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/01/25

[#1186] Bug in chardev? — Andrew Hunt <Andy@...>

2 messages 2000/01/26
[#1187] Re: Bug in chardev? — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/01/26

[#1188] Enumerable and index — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

5 messages 2000/01/27
[#1189] Re: Enumerable and index — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 2000/01/28

In message "[ruby-talk:01188] Enumerable and index"
[#1190] Re: Enumerable and index — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/01/28

gotoken@math.sci.hokudai.ac.jp (GOTO Kentaro) writes:
[#1191] Re: Enumerable and index — gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro) 2000/01/28

In message "[ruby-talk:01190] Re: Enumerable and index"
[#1192] Re: Enumerable and index — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/01/28

gotoken@math.sci.hokudai.ac.jp (GOTO Kentaro) writes:

[#1193] Semantics of chomp/chop — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

7 messages 2000/01/28
[#1205] Re: Semantics of chomp/chop — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/01/31

matz@netlab.co.jp (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:
[#1194] Re: Semantics of chomp/chop — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/01/28

Hi,
[#1195] Re: Semantics of chomp/chop — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/01/29

matz@netlab.co.jp (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:
[#1203] Re: Semantics of chomp/chop — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/01/31

Hi,
[#1196] Re: Semantics of chomp/chop — ts <decoux@...> 2000/01/29

>>>>> "D" == Dave Thomas <Dave@thomases.com> writes:
[#1204] Re: Semantics of chomp/chop — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/01/31

[#1197] Question about 'open' — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

8 messages 2000/01/30
[#1202] Re: Question about 'open' — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/01/31

Hi,
[#1206] Re: Question about 'open' — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/01/31

matz@netlab.co.jp (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:
[#1207] Re: Question about 'open' — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/01/31

Hi,
[#1199] Re: Question about 'open' — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/01/30

ts <decoux@moulon.inra.fr> writes:
[#1200] Re: Question about 'open' — ts <decoux@...> 2000/01/30

>>>>> "D" == Dave Thomas <Dave@thomases.com> writes:
[#1198] Re: Question about 'open' — ts <decoux@...> 2000/01/30

>>>>> "D" == Dave Thomas <Dave@thomases.com> writes:
[#1201] Re: Question about 'open' — Dave Thomas <Dave@...> 2000/01/30

ts <decoux@moulon.inra.fr> writes:

[#1208] File#flock — ts <decoux@...>

5 messages 2000/01/31
[#1209] Re: File#flock — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/01/31

Hi,
[#1210] Re: File#flock — ts <decoux@...> 2000/01/31

>>>>> "Y" == Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@netlab.co.jp> writes:
[#1211] Re: File#flock — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/01/31

[#1212] Re: File#flock — ts <decoux@...> 2000/01/31

>>>>> "Y" == Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@netlab.co.jp> writes:

[#1213] c-call and call in trace_func — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>

2 messages 2000/01/31
[#1214] Re: c-call and call in trace_func — matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto) 2000/02/01

Hi,

[ruby-talk:01038] Re: Is this a bug?

From: Yasushi Shoji <yashi@...>
Date: 2000-01-03 19:39:36 UTC
List: ruby-talk #1038 
hi,

sorry to jump in the middle of the discussion but..

From: Dave Thomas <Dave@thomases.com>
Subject: [ruby-talk:01036] Re: Is this a bug?
Date: 03 Jan 2000 13:29:52 -0600

> > I think it is a kind of bug.  Maybe, it will take some long time to
> > solve it and get been stable.
> 
> Apart from the potential for confusion, I'm worried about
> portability. If the interpretation of a string of characters depends
> on the local, and on the way Ruby has been compiled, then scripts are
> not portable between machines, and that's a problem.

It'd be better to use ascii char set only, if you are warring about
portability of your script.  I believe an ascii-char-set-only-script
is not depending on the compile time options.

regards,
--
            yashi

In This Thread

Prev Next