[#1026] Is this a bug? — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
18 messages
2000/01/03
[#1053] rand() / drand48() — ts <decoux@...>
11 messages
2000/01/05
[#1055] Re: rand() / drand48()
— matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
2000/01/05
[#1061] Re: rand() / drand48()
— gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro)
2000/01/07
Hi,
[#1067] Here docs not skipping leading spaces — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
5 messages
2000/01/08
[#1083] YADQ (Yet Another Dumb Question) — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
12 messages
2000/01/10
[#1084] Infinite loop — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
17 messages
2000/01/11
[#1104] The value of while... — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
24 messages
2000/01/11
[#1114] Re: The value of while...
— Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
2000/01/12
matz@netlab.co.jp (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:
[#1128] Re: The value of while... — David Suarez de Lis <excalibor@...>
Hi all,
1 message
2000/01/12
[#1133] Re: Class variables... — David Suarez de Lis <excalibor@...>
Hi there,
2 messages
2000/01/12
[#1158] Is this expected behavior? — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
6 messages
2000/01/21
[#1172] Re: Possible bug in ruby-man-1.4 — Huayin Wang <wang@...>
> |Well, I guess it comes down to what you mean by an integer
10 messages
2000/01/24
[#1177] Re: Possible bug in ruby-man-1.4
— Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
2000/01/25
matz@netlab.co.jp (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:
[#1188] Enumerable and index — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
5 messages
2000/01/27
[#1193] Semantics of chomp/chop — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
7 messages
2000/01/28
[#1197] Question about 'open' — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
8 messages
2000/01/30
[ruby-talk:01034] Re: Is this a bug?
From:
Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
Date:
2000-01-03 18:41:52 UTC
List:
ruby-talk #1034
Dave Thomas <Dave@thomases.com> writes: > Guy Decoux suggested changing DEFAULT_KCODE, but a > quick grep suggests it's only used in the re.c module. But the re module is used to validate identifiers, and setting DEFAULT_KCODE=none now makes the following fail to compile: = 1 > /tc/dave/play/line.rb:1: Invalid char '爭 in expression /tc/dave/play/line.rb:1: parse error = 1 So the problem is fixed (thanks, Guy!) I'm wondering if configure.in needs to be changed to pick a default for DEFAULT_KCODE somehow based on the machine's environment. As a secondary issue, what does all this mean for the portability of Ruby source. If your system is compilers with EUC and mine with NONE, will I not be able to compile your programs? Regards (and thanks again) Dave -- Thomas Consulting. Innovative and successful developments with Unix, Java, C, and C++. Now in bookstores: The Pragmatic Programmer. www.pragmaticprogrammer.com/ppbook/