From: matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
Date: 2000-01-08T15:26:07+09:00
Subject: [ruby-talk:01073] Re: rand() / drand48()

Hi,

In message "[ruby-talk:01068] Re: rand() / drand48()"
    on 00/01/08, GOTO Kentaro <gotoken@math.sci.hokudai.ac.jp> writes:

|But such behavoir makes people to misunderstand that a series of the
|first rand value makes a random sequences as good as a rand sequence
|is.

I don't get it, sorry.  So do you think we should preserve this
undocumented behavior or not?  For me, current behavior (returns
random value for each run) is less confusing.

							matz.