[#1026] Is this a bug? — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
18 messages
2000/01/03
[#1053] rand() / drand48() — ts <decoux@...>
11 messages
2000/01/05
[#1055] Re: rand() / drand48()
— matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
2000/01/05
[#1061] Re: rand() / drand48()
— gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro)
2000/01/07
Hi,
[#1067] Here docs not skipping leading spaces — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
5 messages
2000/01/08
[#1083] YADQ (Yet Another Dumb Question) — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
12 messages
2000/01/10
[#1084] Infinite loop — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
17 messages
2000/01/11
[#1104] The value of while... — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
24 messages
2000/01/11
[#1114] Re: The value of while...
— Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
2000/01/12
matz@netlab.co.jp (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:
[#1128] Re: The value of while... — David Suarez de Lis <excalibor@...>
Hi all,
1 message
2000/01/12
[#1133] Re: Class variables... — David Suarez de Lis <excalibor@...>
Hi there,
2 messages
2000/01/12
[#1158] Is this expected behavior? — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
6 messages
2000/01/21
[#1172] Re: Possible bug in ruby-man-1.4 — Huayin Wang <wang@...>
> |Well, I guess it comes down to what you mean by an integer
10 messages
2000/01/24
[#1177] Re: Possible bug in ruby-man-1.4
— Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
2000/01/25
matz@netlab.co.jp (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:
[#1188] Enumerable and index — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
5 messages
2000/01/27
[#1193] Semantics of chomp/chop — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
7 messages
2000/01/28
[#1197] Question about 'open' — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
8 messages
2000/01/30
[ruby-talk:01069] Re: Here docs not skipping leading spaces
From:
matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
Date:
2000-01-08 04:34:15 UTC
List:
ruby-talk #1069
Hi,
In message "[ruby-talk:01067] Here docs not skipping leading spaces"
on 00/01/07, Dave Thomas <Dave@thomases.com> writes:
|I notice the code for stripping leading whitespace from <<-LABEL here
|docs has been ifdef'd out.
|
|Is this functionality no longer supported?
Since we couldn't agreed how to remove leading whitespaces, it has
been pending for long time.
For exapmle, there are several option to generate a string from the
code below:
eval <<-FOO
class Foo
def foo
...
... (2tabs)
end
end
FOO
(1) remove no leading whitespace.
this is how Ruby works currently.
<<
class Foo
def foo
...
... (2tabs)
end
end
FOO
>>
(2) remove leading tabs but no spaces
this is how def'd out code works.
<<
class Foo
def foo
...
... (2tabs)
end
end
FOO
>>
(2) remove leading space based on the terminating line.
this may be the most natural way, but it requires 2 pass scan for
heredoc strings by bunch of complex code.
<<
class Foo
def foo
...
... (2tabs)
end
end
FOO
>>
Any ideas?
matz.