[#1026] Is this a bug? — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
18 messages
2000/01/03
[#1053] rand() / drand48() — ts <decoux@...>
11 messages
2000/01/05
[#1055] Re: rand() / drand48()
— matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
2000/01/05
[#1061] Re: rand() / drand48()
— gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro)
2000/01/07
Hi,
[#1067] Here docs not skipping leading spaces — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
5 messages
2000/01/08
[#1083] YADQ (Yet Another Dumb Question) — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
12 messages
2000/01/10
[#1084] Infinite loop — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
17 messages
2000/01/11
[#1104] The value of while... — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
24 messages
2000/01/11
[#1114] Re: The value of while...
— Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
2000/01/12
matz@netlab.co.jp (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:
[#1128] Re: The value of while... — David Suarez de Lis <excalibor@...>
Hi all,
1 message
2000/01/12
[#1133] Re: Class variables... — David Suarez de Lis <excalibor@...>
Hi there,
2 messages
2000/01/12
[#1158] Is this expected behavior? — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
6 messages
2000/01/21
[#1172] Re: Possible bug in ruby-man-1.4 — Huayin Wang <wang@...>
> |Well, I guess it comes down to what you mean by an integer
10 messages
2000/01/24
[#1177] Re: Possible bug in ruby-man-1.4
— Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
2000/01/25
matz@netlab.co.jp (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:
[#1188] Enumerable and index — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
5 messages
2000/01/27
[#1193] Semantics of chomp/chop — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
7 messages
2000/01/28
[#1197] Question about 'open' — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
8 messages
2000/01/30
[ruby-talk:01111] Re: YADQ (Yet Another Dumb Question)
From:
matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
Date:
2000-01-12 05:58:03 UTC
List:
ruby-talk #1111
Hi,
In message "[ruby-talk:01110] Re: YADQ (Yet Another Dumb Question)"
on 00/01/11, Dave Thomas <Dave@thomases.com> writes:
|In what circumstances are modules normally reloaded (rather than
|having the program simply restarted)? Would it suffice to say that you
|don't issue the warning if the constant's value did not change?
I'm thiking of interactive systems like browsers. This problem was
found by JED/Ruby when it tried to provide interactive Ruby feature.
|Alternatively, we could think about itemizing the different kinds of
|warnings and letting the program turn individual warning messages on
|and off (a bit like Perl's 'use strict')
|
| no_warn %w( REDEFINED_CONSTANT REDEFINED_METHOD ) {
| load "mymod.rb"
| }
Let me think about it.
* whether redefining raises an exception, or warning, or report nothing.
* if reports some kind of error, whether it can be stopped or not.
Hmm, 5 combinations. And if error reports can be stopped, we should
determine how to specify it.
matz.