[#1026] Is this a bug? — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
18 messages
2000/01/03
[#1053] rand() / drand48() — ts <decoux@...>
11 messages
2000/01/05
[#1055] Re: rand() / drand48()
— matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
2000/01/05
[#1061] Re: rand() / drand48()
— gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro)
2000/01/07
Hi,
[#1067] Here docs not skipping leading spaces — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
5 messages
2000/01/08
[#1083] YADQ (Yet Another Dumb Question) — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
12 messages
2000/01/10
[#1084] Infinite loop — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
17 messages
2000/01/11
[#1104] The value of while... — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
24 messages
2000/01/11
[#1114] Re: The value of while...
— Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
2000/01/12
matz@netlab.co.jp (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:
[#1128] Re: The value of while... — David Suarez de Lis <excalibor@...>
Hi all,
1 message
2000/01/12
[#1133] Re: Class variables... — David Suarez de Lis <excalibor@...>
Hi there,
2 messages
2000/01/12
[#1158] Is this expected behavior? — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
6 messages
2000/01/21
[#1172] Re: Possible bug in ruby-man-1.4 — Huayin Wang <wang@...>
> |Well, I guess it comes down to what you mean by an integer
10 messages
2000/01/24
[#1177] Re: Possible bug in ruby-man-1.4
— Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
2000/01/25
matz@netlab.co.jp (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:
[#1188] Enumerable and index — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
5 messages
2000/01/27
[#1193] Semantics of chomp/chop — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
7 messages
2000/01/28
[#1197] Question about 'open' — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
8 messages
2000/01/30
[ruby-talk:01037] Re: Is this a bug?
From:
matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
Date:
2000-01-03 18:30:32 UTC
List:
ruby-talk #1037
Hi,
In message "[ruby-talk:01026] Is this a bug?"
on 00/01/03, Dave Thomas <Dave@thomases.com> writes:
|Given the following:
|
| = 1
| print 爼 "\n"
|
|(where the variable is an 'a' with a grave accent), I get
|
| /tc/dave/play/line.rb:2: undefined method `爼'
| for #<Object:0x40197ed4> (NameError)
|
|Comment out the 'print'line, and it runs.
|
|I'm sure I'm missing something obvious, but why is '爭 treated
|differently in the two lines?
Because I have no knowledge about iso-8859-1, non ascii characters
are not treated as usual characters in Ruby. Identifiers must be in
[A-Za-z_][A-Za-z_0-9]*
The reason it seemed to work partly is Ruby confused it as EUC
(Extended Unix Code, encoding for Japanese multibyte character
string). If you put -Kn option to the interpreter, it reports as it
should. I think it's better to do
./configure --with-default-kcode=none
at your compile time. Maybe it should be default. I'll do it for
next release.
Oh, and could you tell me any idea about treating iso-8859-1
characters in single byte mode (with -Kn)?
matz.