[#1026] Is this a bug? — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
18 messages
2000/01/03
[#1053] rand() / drand48() — ts <decoux@...>
11 messages
2000/01/05
[#1055] Re: rand() / drand48()
— matz@... (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
2000/01/05
[#1061] Re: rand() / drand48()
— gotoken@... (GOTO Kentaro)
2000/01/07
Hi,
[#1067] Here docs not skipping leading spaces — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
5 messages
2000/01/08
[#1083] YADQ (Yet Another Dumb Question) — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
12 messages
2000/01/10
[#1084] Infinite loop — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
17 messages
2000/01/11
[#1104] The value of while... — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
24 messages
2000/01/11
[#1114] Re: The value of while...
— Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
2000/01/12
matz@netlab.co.jp (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:
[#1128] Re: The value of while... — David Suarez de Lis <excalibor@...>
Hi all,
1 message
2000/01/12
[#1133] Re: Class variables... — David Suarez de Lis <excalibor@...>
Hi there,
2 messages
2000/01/12
[#1158] Is this expected behavior? — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
6 messages
2000/01/21
[#1172] Re: Possible bug in ruby-man-1.4 — Huayin Wang <wang@...>
> |Well, I guess it comes down to what you mean by an integer
10 messages
2000/01/24
[#1177] Re: Possible bug in ruby-man-1.4
— Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
2000/01/25
matz@netlab.co.jp (Yukihiro Matsumoto) writes:
[#1188] Enumerable and index — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
5 messages
2000/01/27
[#1193] Semantics of chomp/chop — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
7 messages
2000/01/28
[#1197] Question about 'open' — Dave Thomas <Dave@...>
8 messages
2000/01/30
[ruby-talk:01133] Re: Class variables...
From:
David Suarez de Lis <excalibor@...>
Date:
2000-01-12 16:46:13 UTC
List:
ruby-talk #1133
Hi there,
matz wrote:
> Ruby does not have the class variables (yet).
>
> Typical idiom to share value among instances is:
>
> class Person
> Population = [0]
> def new(the_name = nil)
> @name = the_name
> Population[0] += 1
> end
> end
I thought Capital case identifiers were constants... Unless Population is a constant Array of 1 value, but the value inside the array is variable... ?
> |Also, I assume END {} allows us to put conditions for GC?
> |Like END { @Person::population -= 1 }
>
> No, END is like at_exit(3) for C.
> For something to be processed at GC time, use finalizers.
>
> require 'final'
>
> ObjectSpace.define_finalizer(obj, proc)
I see, interesting although a bit complicated (according with \cle's examples...) does this add a new object to a program (or, better said, a new object per object we create)?
>
> will call proc on GC. Notice the proc should not point obj directly,
> or indirectly. Ask \Cle. for more detail. :-)
Thanks, nice work with the language,
d@
-------------------------------------------------------------
Mensaje enviado gracias al correo gratuito de Demasiado Corp.
[http://correo.demasiado.com]
-------------------------------------------------------------