ruby-core

On 4/11/06, Marcus Rueckert <mrueckert@suse.de> wrote:> On 2006-04-12 02:04:32 +0900, Eric Hodel wrote:> > This package was installed incorrectly. Third party ruby packages go> > in /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/> from a distributors point of view i would leave the site_ruby part for> packages installed by an user. so you can differ between distro packaged> libraries and user installed libraries. in perl you have the vendor dir> for that. but that is missing in ruby so far. so i think putting them> into the main dir is the better choice atm.

[#7711] Re: site_ruby or not site_ruby (was: Re: Bug in libsnmp-ruby1.8) — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/04/11

On Apr 11, 2006, at 10:20 AM, Marcus Rueckert wrote:

[#7713] Re: site_ruby or not site_ruby (was: Re: Bug in libsnmp-ruby1.8) — Marcus Rueckert <mrueckert@...> 2006/04/11

On 2006-04-12 02:45:07 +0900, Eric Hodel wrote:

[#7714] Re: site_ruby or not site_ruby (was: Re: Bug in libsnmp-ruby1.8) — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/04/11

On Apr 11, 2006, at 11:14 AM, Marcus Rueckert wrote:

[#7715] Re: site_ruby or not site_ruby — mathew <meta@...> 2006/04/11

Marcus Rueckert wrote:

[#7716] ri crash when merging different ri — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>

If ri for a document is split across two files but one has no extra

1 message 2006/04/12

[#7717] Test::Unit::Assertions RDoc — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>

This patch contains some spiffy RDoc for Test::Unit::Assertions. No

1 message 2006/04/12

[#7721] Ruby mentor in Googe's Summer of Code — "Evan Phoenix" <evan@...>

We missed out on it last year, so lets this year try to get ruby

4 messages 2006/04/16

[#7722] Re: Ruby mentor in Googe's Summer of Code — Florian Gro<florgro@...> 2006/04/16

Evan Phoenix wrote:

[#7723] Re: Ruby mentor in Googe's Summer of Code — Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@...> 2006/04/16

Florian Gro<florgro@gmail.com> writes:

[#7724] Re: Ruby mentor in Googe's Summer of Code — dblack@... 2006/04/16

Hi --

[#7725] readpartial not working on ARM — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...>

7 messages 2006/04/17

[#7728] Re: readpartial not working on ARM — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2006/04/17

Joel VanderWerf wrote:

[#7730] Re: readpartial not working on ARM — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2006/04/18

In article <4443534E.5030303@path.berkeley.edu>,

[#7733] Re: readpartial not working on ARM — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2006/04/18

Tanaka Akira wrote:

[#7735] Re: readpartial not working on ARM — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/04/18

Hi,

[#7736] Re: readpartial not working on ARM — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2006/04/18

Joel VanderWerf wrote:

[#7731] Re: readpartial not working on ARM — ara.t.howard@... 2006/04/18

On Tue, 18 Apr 2006, Tanaka Akira wrote:

[#7726] Windows DEP causes crash — noreply@...

Bugs item #4135, was opened at 2006-04-17 07:16

1 message 2006/04/17

[#7727] Stack trace doesn't include class — noreply@...

Bugs item #4151, was opened at 2006-04-17 23:10

10 messages 2006/04/17

[#7734] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-4151 ] Stack trace doesn't include class — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/04/18

On Apr 17, 2006, at 1:11 PM, noreply@rubyforge.org wrote:

[#7741] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-4151 ] Stack trace doesn't include class — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2006/04/19

On Wed, 19 Apr 2006, Eric Hodel wrote:

[#7747] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-4151 ] Stack trace doesn't include class — dblack@... 2006/04/20

Hi --

[#7748] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-4151 ] Stack trace doesn't include class — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2006/04/20

On Fri, 21 Apr 2006 dblack@wobblini.net wrote:

[#7749] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-4151 ] Stack trace doesn't include class — dblack@... 2006/04/20

Hi --

[#7750] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-4151 ] Stack trace doesn't include class — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2006/04/20

On Fri, 21 Apr 2006 dblack@wobblini.net wrote:

[#7752] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-4151 ] Stack trace doesn't include class — dblack@... 2006/04/20

Hi --

[#7737] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-4151 ] Stack trace doesn't include class — "Timothy J. Wood" <tjw@...> 2006/04/18

[#7742] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-4151 ] Stack trace doesn't include class — Mathieu Bouchard <matju@...> 2006/04/19

On Wed, 19 Apr 2006, Timothy J. Wood wrote:

[#7729] xmlrpc and charset=utf-8 — "Phil Tomson" <rubyfan@...>

I'm needed to interact with an XMLRPC server written using the

10 messages 2006/04/17

[#8011] Re: xmlrpc and charset=utf-8 — Daniel Berger <djberg96@...> 2006/06/18

[#8014] Re: xmlrpc and charset=utf-8 — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...> 2006/06/19

On Saturday 17 June 2006 23:00, Daniel Berger wrote:

[#8018] Re: xmlrpc and charset=utf-8 — Kazuhiro NISHIYAMA <zn@...> 2006/06/19

>>>>> On Sun, 18 Jun 2006 12:00:19 +0900

[#8019] Re: xmlrpc and charset=utf-8 — Sean Russell <ser@...> 2006/06/19

I first sent this from the wrong email account, so if that post somehow makes

[#8020] Re: xmlrpc and charset=utf-8 — "Dominique Brezinski" <dominique.brezinski@...> 2006/06/19

On 6/19/06, Sean Russell <ser@germane-software.com> wrote:

[#12194] Re: xmlrpc and charset=utf-8 — jesse_c <jesse@...> 2007/09/18

[#12196] Re: xmlrpc and charset=utf-8 — Martin Duerst <duerst@...> 2007/09/18

At 10:02 07/09/18, jesse_c wrote:

[#12257] Re: xmlrpc and charset=utf-8 — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...> 2007/09/27

On Tuesday 18 September 2007, Martin Duerst wrote:

[#12269] Re: xmlrpc and charset=utf-8 — Jesse Clark <jesse@...> 2007/09/27

[#7732] Re: Welcome to our (ruby-core ML) You are added automatically — paul.ogaz@...

guide

1 message 2006/04/18

[#7738] RDoc patches for GetoptLong — mathew <meta@...>

I added RDoc documentation to GetoptLong. The patches are attached. As

4 messages 2006/04/19

[#7739] Re: RDoc patches for GetoptLong — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/04/19

On Apr 18, 2006, at 6:59 PM, mathew wrote:

[#7743] Re: RDoc patches for GetoptLong — mathew <meta@...> 2006/04/20

Eric Hodel wrote:

[#7740] Re: RDoc patches for GetoptLong — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/04/19

Hi,

[#7744] Coverity Scan — "Pat Eyler" <rubypate@...>

I don't know if anyone else has signed up for access to the coverity

5 messages 2006/04/20

[#7755] Re: Coverity Scan — Hidetoshi NAGAI <nagai@...> 2006/04/21

From: "Pat Eyler" <rubypate@gmail.com>

[#7757] Re: Coverity Scan — "Pat Eyler" <rubypate@...> 2006/04/24

should I continue to post these then?

[#7763] Re: Coverity Scan — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/04/25

Hi,

[#7745] Re: Coverity Scan — "Pat Eyler" <rubypate@...> 2006/04/20

On 4/20/06, Pat Eyler <rubypate@gmail.com> wrote:

[#7746] gcd2 problem in 1.9 snapshot — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...>

$ ruby19 -v -r mathn -e 1

2 messages 2006/04/20

[#7753] Re: gcd2 problem in 1.9 snapshot — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/04/21

Hi,

[#7756] make check finds 51 errors and 7 failures — noreply@...

Bugs item #4205, was opened at 2006-04-21 16:28

1 message 2006/04/21

[#7758] Another Coverity Defect — "Pat Eyler" <rubypate@...>

this one is in ruby/regcomp.c (there are three more 'deadcode'

1 message 2006/04/24

[#7759] A different look at the coverity report — "Pat Eyler" <rubypate@...>

Checker Function File

1 message 2006/04/24

[#7760] Patch for ri to show subclasses at class documentation — Sven Klemm <sven@...3d2.de>

Hello,

1 message 2006/04/25

[#7761] Re: A different look at the coverity report — ville.mattila@...

2 messages 2006/04/25

[#7762] Re: A different look at the coverity report — "Pat Eyler" <rubypate@...> 2006/04/25

On 4/24/06, ville.mattila@stonesoft.com <ville.mattila@stonesoft.com> wrote:

[#7764] Patch: code-cleanup (const...) — Stefan Huehner <stefan@...>

Hi,

4 messages 2006/04/25

[#7769] Re: Patch: code-cleanup (const...) — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/04/26

Hi,

[#7777] Re: Patch: code-cleanup (const...) — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2006/04/26

On Tue, Apr 25, 2006 at 08:20:18PM +0900, Stefan Huehner wrote:

[#7779] Re: Patch: code-cleanup (const...) — Stefan Huehner <stefan@...> 2006/04/26

On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 02:50:14AM +0900, Sam Roberts wrote:

[#7765] possible defect in array.c — "Pat Eyler" <rubypate@...>

This one may be a false positive, I'm not sure. If it is, I'll happily mark

5 messages 2006/04/25

[#7766] Re: possible defect in array.c — "Jacob Fugal" <lukfugl@...> 2006/04/25

On 4/25/06, Pat Eyler <rubypate@gmail.com> wrote:

[#7767] Re: possible defect in array.c — "Pat Eyler" <rubypate@...> 2006/04/25

On 4/25/06, Jacob Fugal <lukfugl@gmail.com> wrote:

[#7768] Re: possible defect in array.c — "Dominique Brezinski" <dominique.brezinski@...> 2006/04/25

I find it interesting that the Coverity scan does not detect integer

[#7776] Re: possible defect in array.c — "Dominique Brezinski" <dominique.brezinski@...> 2006/04/26

On 4/25/06, Dominique Brezinski <dominique.brezinski@gmail.com> wrote:

[#7770] Re: possible defect in array.c — "Brown, Warren" <warrenbrown@...>

> rb_range_beg_len (in range.c) does set beg and len.

13 messages 2006/04/26

[#7771] Re: possible defect in array.c — "Pat Eyler" <rubypate@...> 2006/04/26

On 4/26/06, Brown, Warren <warrenbrown@aquire.com> wrote:

[#7772] Re: possible defect in array.c — "Jacob Fugal" <lukfugl@...> 2006/04/26

On 4/26/06, Pat Eyler <rubypate@gmail.com> wrote:

[#7773] Re: possible defect in array.c — "Pat Eyler" <rubypate@...> 2006/04/26

On 4/26/06, Jacob Fugal <lukfugl@gmail.com> wrote:

[#7780] Re: possible defect in array.c — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2006/04/26

On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 01:15:24AM +0900, Pat Eyler wrote:

[#7781] Re: possible defect in array.c — "Nobuyoshi Nakada" <nobu@...> 2006/04/27

Hi,

[#7782] Re: possible defect in array.c — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2006/04/27

On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 09:41:00AM +0900, Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:

[#7783] Re: possible defect in array.c — "Nobuyoshi Nakada" <nobu@...> 2006/04/27

Hi,

[#7788] Re: possible defect in array.c — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2006/04/27

Quoting nobu@ruby-lang.org, on Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 11:55:17AM +0900:

[#7794] Re: possible defect in array.c — Christian Neukirchen <chneukirchen@...> 2006/04/27

Sam Roberts <sroberts@uniserve.com> writes:

[#7784] Re: possible defect in array.c — "Pat Eyler" <rubypate@...> 2006/04/27

On 4/26/06, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#7774] Re: possible defect in array.c — Stefan Huehner <stefan@...> 2006/04/26

On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 01:15:24AM +0900, Pat Eyler wrote:

[#7778] Re: possible defect in array.c — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...> 2006/04/26

On Thu, 27 Apr 2006, Pat Eyler wrote:

[#7775] Another class of problem — "Pat Eyler" <rubypate@...>

(Well, it looks like someone cleaned up a possible defect in the

1 message 2006/04/26

[#7785] possible defect in ext/openssl/ossl_ans1.c (with fix) — "Pat Eyler" <rubypate@...>

768 VALUE klass = *ossl_asn1_info[tag].klass;

1 message 2006/04/27

[#7786] Re: possible defect in ext/openssl/ossl_ans1.c (with fix) — ville.mattila@...

3 messages 2006/04/27

[#7787] Re: possible defect in ext/openssl/ossl_ans1.c (with fix) — "Pat Eyler" <rubypate@...> 2006/04/27

On 4/26/06, ville.mattila@stonesoft.com <ville.mattila@stonesoft.com> wrote:

[#7789] Re: possible defect in ext/openssl/ossl_ans1.c (with fix) — "Jacob Fugal" <lukfugl@...> 2006/04/27

On 4/26/06, ville.mattila@stonesoft.com <ville.mattila@stonesoft.com> wrote:

[#7790] Re: possible defect in ext/openssl/ossl_ans1.c (with fix) — ville.mattila@...

3 messages 2006/04/27

[#7793] Re: possible defect in ext/openssl/ossl_ans1.c (with fix) — Stephen Waits <steve@...> 2006/04/27

[#7798] Re: possible defect in ext/openssl/ossl_ans1.c (with fix) — GOTOU Yuuzou <gotoyuzo@...> 2006/04/28

Hi,

[#7791] use -shared to gcc for shared link Solaris — "Andrew Morrow" <andrew.c.morrow@...>

While trying to build a 64 bit ruby from cvs on Solaris 10 x86 with a

1 message 2006/04/27

[#7792] Another unitialized variable defect — "Pat Eyler" <rubypate@...>

(I hope I'm finally getting the hang of this.)

1 message 2006/04/27

[#7795] Right way to handle memory allocation failures (related to fix for array.c issue)? — "Dominique Brezinski" <dominique.brezinski@...>

To fix the integer wrap in rb_array_fill, there is a simple check that

1 message 2006/04/27

[#7796] Float near Float::MIN — noreply@...

Bugs item #4284, was opened at 2006-04-27 21:14

2 messages 2006/04/27

[#7797] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-4284 ] Float near Float::MIN — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/04/28

Hi,

[#7799] Patch: code-cleanup (k&r style) — Stefan Huehner <stefan@...>

Hi,

6 messages 2006/04/28

[#7801] Re: Patch: code-cleanup (k&r style) — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/05/01

Hi,

[#7802] Re: Patch: code-cleanup (k&r style) — ts <decoux@...> 2006/05/01

>>>>> "Y" == Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> writes:

[#7803] Re: Patch: code-cleanup (k&r style) — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/05/01

Hi,

[#7804] Re: Patch: code-cleanup (k&r style) — Stefan Huehner <stefan@...> 2006/05/01

On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 08:05:34PM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#7805] Re: Patch: code-cleanup (k&r style) — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/05/02

Hi,

[#7800] Net::IMAP#disconnect + SSL hangs — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>

When calling Net::IMAP#disconnect when using an SSL connection the

1 message 2006/04/28

Re: possible defect in array.c

From: Sam Roberts <sroberts@...>

Date: 2006-04-27 05:11:49 UTC

List: ruby-core #7788

Quoting nobu@ruby-lang.org, on Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 11:55:17AM +0900:
> Hi,
> 
> 2006/4/27, Sam Roberts <sroberts@uniserve.com>:
> > Are you sure? It appears to support non-standard extensions in both C99
> > and C89 dialects. I'm not complaining, the extensions are useful, but
> > just because gcc compiled it doesn't mean its standard C, of any
> > particular dialect.
> 
> Well, you're correct it has its own extensions not only C99 and C89
> standards, and you need -pedaintic-errors option to let gcc be strict
> with them.  But it doesn't croak if -std=c99 is also given, and I
> thought it is the default in gcc4, IIRC.

I think you are right about that.

> I meant that change about the based standards.

Yes, I see your point, the particular thing he was doing is standard
now, not a gnu extension.

I think gcc allowed it well before 1999 though! I tend to stick to the
older standard, porting from C99 to C89 would be awful, and there are
still many older compilers around for embedded system. It appears to
me that ruby src doesn't assume a C99 compiler currently, I hope it
will continue to build with C89.

Cheers,
Sam

Thread

Prev Next

In This Thread

Prev Next