[#7708] Bug in libsnmp-ruby1.8 — Hadmut Danisch <hadmut@...>

Hi,

8 messages 2006/04/11
[#7709] Re: Bug in libsnmp-ruby1.8 — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/04/11

On Apr 11, 2006, at 6:23 AM, Hadmut Danisch wrote:

[#7770] Re: possible defect in array.c — "Brown, Warren" <warrenbrown@...>

> rb_range_beg_len (in range.c) does set beg and len.

13 messages 2006/04/26
[#7771] Re: possible defect in array.c — "Pat Eyler" <rubypate@...> 2006/04/26

On 4/26/06, Brown, Warren <warrenbrown@aquire.com> wrote:

[ ruby-Bugs-4050 ] Config::CONFIG["INSTALL"] incorrectly set on some Solaris installations (with patch)

From: noreply@...
Date: 2006-04-09 08:18:54 UTC
List: ruby-core #7693
Bugs item #4050, was opened at 2006-04-09 10:18
You can respond by visiting: 
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1698&aid=4050&group_id=426

Category: Core
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Calle Dybedahl (cdybedahl)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: Config::CONFIG["INSTALL"] incorrectly set on some Solaris installations (with patch)

Initial Comment:
If there is no BSD-compatible install program visible when one compiles Ruby on Solaris, Config::CONFIG["INSTALL"] will end up incorrectly set to "./install-sh". This prevents any external libraries with C components from being installed. Since simply removing this line from rbconfig.rb makes extconf fall back to a perfectly working Ruby alternative, it would seem that the easiest way to fix this is to simply not set that value at all if a suitable program can't be found. The included patch against the CVS version of mkconfig.rb makes it so that the line isn't set for any INSTALL value in config.status that starts with ./ (on the assupmtion that such a value will never work in the source directory of an externally provided extension library).

Additionally, it's way to fucking complicated to report Ruby bugs. If you really want people to help out, *please* make it much less onerous.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1698&aid=4050&group_id=426

In This Thread

Prev Next