[#7708] Bug in libsnmp-ruby1.8 — Hadmut Danisch <hadmut@...>

Hi,

8 messages 2006/04/11
[#7709] Re: Bug in libsnmp-ruby1.8 — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/04/11

On Apr 11, 2006, at 6:23 AM, Hadmut Danisch wrote:

[#7770] Re: possible defect in array.c — "Brown, Warren" <warrenbrown@...>

> rb_range_beg_len (in range.c) does set beg and len.

13 messages 2006/04/26
[#7771] Re: possible defect in array.c — "Pat Eyler" <rubypate@...> 2006/04/26

On 4/26/06, Brown, Warren <warrenbrown@aquire.com> wrote:

Re: [ ruby-Bugs-4151 ] Stack trace doesn't include class

From: dblack@...
Date: 2006-04-20 21:30:14 UTC
List: ruby-core #7747
Hi --

On Thu, 20 Apr 2006, Mathieu Bouchard wrote:

> You don't *have* to read the word "class" the wrong way. It doesn't always
> mean a non-singleton class and it doesn't even always mean an instance
> of the Class class. it can be a non-Class Module too, because modules
> are those second-class citizens that work the same way classes do
> except that they don't have the right to sit down when they take the
> bus.

I can't think of any context where I would use the word "class" to
describe an instance of Module.  I know you've lobbied for unification
of Module and Class, but as the language actually is, they're not
unified and it's definitely not wrong to use the word "class" to refer
exclusively to instances of Class.


David

-- 
David A. Black (dblack@wobblini.net)
Ruby Power and Light, LLC (http://www.rubypowerandlight.com)

"Ruby for Rails" PDF now on sale!  http://www.manning.com/black
Paper version coming in early May!

In This Thread