[#7872] Nonblocking socket-connect — "Francis Cianfrocca" <garbagecat10@...>

All, I needed a nonblocking socket connect for my asynchronous-event

18 messages 2006/05/14
[#7873] Re: Nonblocking socket-connect — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2006/05/14

In article <3a94cf510605140559l7baa0205le341dac4f47d424b@mail.gmail.com>,

[#7874] Re: Nonblocking socket-connect — "Francis Cianfrocca" <garbagecat10@...> 2006/05/15

How about introducing the method Socket#set_nonblocking, or alternatively

[#7875] Re: Nonblocking socket-connect — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/05/15

Hi,

[#7876] Re: Nonblocking socket-connect — "Francis Cianfrocca" <garbagecat10@...> 2006/05/15

Well, it's ok then. I'm comfortable adding in the nonblocking

[#7877] Re: Nonblocking socket-connect — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/05/15

Hi,

Re: Patch: code-cleanup (k&r style)

From: Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
Date: 2006-05-01 07:33:38 UTC
List: ruby-core #7801
Hi,

In message "Re: Patch: code-cleanup (k&r style)"
    on Sat, 29 Apr 2006 00:49:08 +0900, Stefan Huehner <stefan@huehner.org> writes:

|attached patch convert function declarations from ancient K&R Style to
|modern. Additonally this lets the compiler do some more checks.
|
|Please consider applying.

Thank you I will apply the patch.

|This patch is independant from the other cleanup which is pending
|(ruby_cleanup1.diff)

I think I missed this one.  Could you mention the mail number
(e.g. ruby-core:07799) of the patch mail?

							matz.

In This Thread