From: Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
Date: 2006-05-21T23:39:21+09:00
Subject: Re: Nonblocking socket-connect

Hi,

In message "Re: Nonblocking socket-connect"
    on Sat, 20 May 2006 17:01:03 +0900, Tanaka Akira <akr@m17n.org> writes:

|Do you find an acceptable name?
|
|    connect_nonblock 
|  nbconnect
|    connectnb
|    connect!
|
|    accept_nonblock
|  nbaccept
|    acceptnb
|
|    recvfrom_nonblock
|  nbrecvfrom

*_nonblock sound better than others from my POV.  Any opinion?
Is there any issue other than a name left?

							matz.