[#7872] Nonblocking socket-connect — "Francis Cianfrocca" <garbagecat10@...>

All, I needed a nonblocking socket connect for my asynchronous-event

18 messages 2006/05/14
[#7873] Re: Nonblocking socket-connect — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2006/05/14

In article <3a94cf510605140559l7baa0205le341dac4f47d424b@mail.gmail.com>,

[#7874] Re: Nonblocking socket-connect — "Francis Cianfrocca" <garbagecat10@...> 2006/05/15

How about introducing the method Socket#set_nonblocking, or alternatively

[#7875] Re: Nonblocking socket-connect — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/05/15

Hi,

[#7876] Re: Nonblocking socket-connect — "Francis Cianfrocca" <garbagecat10@...> 2006/05/15

Well, it's ok then. I'm comfortable adding in the nonblocking

[#7877] Re: Nonblocking socket-connect — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/05/15

Hi,

Re: Nonblocking socket-connect

From: Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org>
Date: 2006-05-20 08:01:03 UTC
List: ruby-core #7913
In article <1147709691.180288.28647.nullmailer@x31.priv.netlab.jp>,
  Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> writes:

> Note that I'm not against for non-blocking connect.  I just oppose to
> general purpose non-blocking attribute for IO.  Hint: name, name.

Do you find an acceptable name?

    connect_nonblock 
  nbconnect
    connectnb
    connect!

    accept_nonblock
  nbaccept
    acceptnb

    recvfrom_nonblock
  nbrecvfrom
-- 
Tanaka Akira

In This Thread