[#7872] Nonblocking socket-connect — "Francis Cianfrocca" <garbagecat10@...>

All, I needed a nonblocking socket connect for my asynchronous-event

18 messages 2006/05/14
[#7873] Re: Nonblocking socket-connect — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2006/05/14

In article <3a94cf510605140559l7baa0205le341dac4f47d424b@mail.gmail.com>,

[#7874] Re: Nonblocking socket-connect — "Francis Cianfrocca" <garbagecat10@...> 2006/05/15

How about introducing the method Socket#set_nonblocking, or alternatively

[#7875] Re: Nonblocking socket-connect — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/05/15

Hi,

[#7876] Re: Nonblocking socket-connect — "Francis Cianfrocca" <garbagecat10@...> 2006/05/15

Well, it's ok then. I'm comfortable adding in the nonblocking

[#7877] Re: Nonblocking socket-connect — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/05/15

Hi,

Re: Nonblocking socket-connect

From: Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
Date: 2006-05-15 16:14:42 UTC
List: ruby-core #7877
Hi,

In message "Re: Nonblocking socket-connect"
    on Tue, 16 May 2006 00:42:39 +0900, "Francis Cianfrocca" <garbagecat10@gmail.com> writes:

|Well, it's ok then. I'm comfortable adding in the nonblocking
|functions as an extension in my asynchronous-IO framework. If you
|decide it's best to leave nonblocking i/o out of the core, then people
|will be able to get it if necessary through my "eventmachine" library.

Note that I'm not against for non-blocking connect.  I just oppose to
general purpose non-blocking attribute for IO.  Hint: name, name.

							matz.

In This Thread