From: Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...>
Date: 2006-05-16T01:14:42+09:00
Subject: Re: Nonblocking socket-connect

Hi,

In message "Re: Nonblocking socket-connect"
    on Tue, 16 May 2006 00:42:39 +0900, "Francis Cianfrocca" <garbagecat10@gmail.com> writes:

|Well, it's ok then. I'm comfortable adding in the nonblocking
|functions as an extension in my asynchronous-IO framework. If you
|decide it's best to leave nonblocking i/o out of the core, then people
|will be able to get it if necessary through my "eventmachine" library.

Note that I'm not against for non-blocking connect.  I just oppose to
general purpose non-blocking attribute for IO.  Hint: name, name.

							matz.