[#7872] Nonblocking socket-connect — "Francis Cianfrocca" <garbagecat10@...>

All, I needed a nonblocking socket connect for my asynchronous-event

18 messages 2006/05/14
[#7873] Re: Nonblocking socket-connect — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2006/05/14

In article <3a94cf510605140559l7baa0205le341dac4f47d424b@mail.gmail.com>,

[#7874] Re: Nonblocking socket-connect — "Francis Cianfrocca" <garbagecat10@...> 2006/05/15

How about introducing the method Socket#set_nonblocking, or alternatively

[#7875] Re: Nonblocking socket-connect — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/05/15

Hi,

[#7876] Re: Nonblocking socket-connect — "Francis Cianfrocca" <garbagecat10@...> 2006/05/15

Well, it's ok then. I'm comfortable adding in the nonblocking

[#7877] Re: Nonblocking socket-connect — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/05/15

Hi,

Re: 650M process, huge stack trace

From: "Evan Phoenix" <evan@...>
Date: 2006-05-11 21:21:31 UTC
List: ruby-core #7864
It's on linux 2.6. A modified debian box.

On 5/11/06, Timothy J. Wood <tjw@omnigroup.com> wrote:
>
> On May 11, 2006, at 11:54 AM, Evan Phoenix wrote:
>
> > I've been banging my head against the wall trying to figure out why
> > sometimes processes shoot up to using as much ram as possible
> > (currently, the process in question is using 650 MB).
>
>    What OS is this on?  If it is OS X, you could try using vmmap to
> see what the non-heap allocations look like (Mach vm_allocated
> memory, for example).
>
> -tim
>
>
>


-- 
When I do good, I feel good;  when I do bad, I feel bad,
and that is my religion.
    -- Abraham Lincoln (1809 - 1865)


In This Thread

Prev Next