ruby-core

Mailing Lists

ruby-list (For Ruby users, JA) ruby-dev (For Ruby developers, JA) ruby-core (For Ruby developers, EN) ruby-talk (For Ruby users, EN)
2025 2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 2003 2002
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

[#7806] Ruby fails to parse valid wsdl — noreply@...

Bugs item #4336, was opened at 2006-05-02 12:55

1 message 2006/05/02

[#7807] Ruby fails float 80 test in stable tarball (2 May 2006) when compiled with Mingw — noreply@...

Bugs item #4339, was opened at 2006-05-02 19:56

2 messages 2006/05/02
[#7817] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-4339 ] Ruby fails float 80 test in stable tarball (2 May 2006) when compiled with Mingw — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/05/03

Hi,

[#7808] one bug and one false positive defect in yaml2byte.c (we think) — "Pat Eyler" <rubypate@...>

We've been looking at coverity defects during our hacking night. there are two

1 message 2006/05/03

[#7809] uninit bug in yaml/emitter.c — "Pat Eyler" <rubypate@...>

During our hacking night, we also looked at an UNINIT bug in yaml/emitter.c

4 messages 2006/05/03
[#7816] Re: uninit bug in yaml/emitter.c — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/05/03

Hi,
[#7826] Re: uninit bug in yaml/emitter.c — why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...> 2006/05/05

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#7830] Re: uninit bug in yaml/emitter.c — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2006/05/05

why the lucky stiff wrote:

[#7810] patch for UNINIT error in array.c — "Pat Eyler" <rubypate@...>

Along with the unitialized beg, we found a len which doesn't appear to be

1 message 2006/05/03

[#7811] Sather-like iterators — noreply@...

Bugs item #4341, was opened at 2006-05-03 05:28

1 message 2006/05/03

[#7812] Re: patch for UNINIT error in array.c — "Brown, Warren" <warrenbrown@...>

> Along with the unitialized beg, we found a len which

1 message 2006/05/03

[#7813] :!~ not a symbol — noreply@...

Bugs item #4344, was opened at 2006-05-03 17:41

4 messages 2006/05/03
[#7815] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-4344 ] :!~ not a symbol — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/05/03

Hi,
[#7827] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-4344 ] :!~ not a symbol — why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...> 2006/05/05

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#7828] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-4344 ] :!~ not a symbol — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/05/05

[#7814] parsedate doesn't work with GMT dates — noreply@...

Bugs item #4345, was opened at 2006-05-03 08:26

1 message 2006/05/03

[#7818] (security-related) patch to ALLOC macros to prevent integer overflow bugs — "Dominique Brezinski" <dominique.brezinski@...>

While fixing the integer overflow in rb_ary_fill(), it occurred to me

4 messages 2006/05/04
[#7819] Re: (security-related) patch to ALLOC macros to prevent integer overflow bugs — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...> 2006/05/04

On Thu, 4 May 2006, Dominique Brezinski wrote:
[#7820] Re: (security-related) patch to ALLOC macros to prevent integer overflow bugs — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/05/04

Hi,
[#7821] Re: (security-related) patch to ALLOC macros to prevent integer overflow bugs — "Dominique Brezinski" <dominique.brezinski@...> 2006/05/04

On 5/4/06, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#7822] StringScanner#scan() fails on zero-length matches at eos — noreply@...

Bugs item #4361, was opened at 2006-05-04 21:52

1 message 2006/05/04

[#7823] Coverity: Patch/Fix CID 17 OVERRUN_STATIC File: ruby/signal.c — Kevin Tew <tewk@...>

This is a simple out of bounds array access error.

2 messages 2006/05/05
[#7825] Re: Coverity: Patch/Fix CID 17 OVERRUN_STATIC File: ruby/signal.c — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/05/05

Hi,

[#7824] Re: Coverity: Patch/Fix CID 17 OVERRUN_STATIC File: ruby/signal.c — ville.mattila@...

1 message 2006/05/05

[#7829] Ruby fails float 80 test in stable tarball (4 May 2006), on multiple platforms — noreply@...

Bugs item #4365, was opened at 2006-05-05 18:51

1 message 2006/05/05

[#7831] Resolv::DNS and IPv6 nameservers — Stephan Maka <stephan@...>

Hello folks,

3 messages 2006/05/06
[#7836] Re: Resolv::DNS and IPv6 nameservers — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2006/05/06

In article <20060506025652.GA64784@hooker.sin>,
[#7838] Re: Resolv::DNS and IPv6 nameservers — Stephan Maka <stephan@...> 2006/05/06

Tanaka Akira wrote:

[#7832] Re: [python_tutor] Welcome to our (ruby-core ML) You are added automatically — "Coimbra R. Fernando" <fcoimbra@...>

help

1 message 2006/05/06

[#7833] segfault on Proc#call after setting a trace_func — Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@...>

$ cat bug2.rb

6 messages 2006/05/06
[#7834] Re: [BUG] segfault on Proc#call after setting a trace_func — ts <decoux@...> 2006/05/06

>>>>> "M" == Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@acm.org> writes:
[#7835] Re: [BUG] segfault on Proc#call after setting a trace_func — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/05/06

Hi,
[#7911] Re: [BUG] segfault on Proc#call after setting a trace_func — nobu@... 2006/05/19

Hi,
[#7912] Re: [BUG] segfault on Proc#call after setting a trace_func — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/05/20

Hi,
[#7927] Re: [BUG] segfault on Proc#call after setting a trace_func — nobu@... 2006/05/27

Hi,

[#7837] Coverity CID 14 15 Patch — Kevin Tew <tewk@...>

Both errors stem from the possibility of returning a -1, which signals

1 message 2006/05/06

[#7839] Coverity CID 6 7 Appear to be false positives. — Kevin Tew <tewk@...>

CID 6 appears to be a false positive due to the sequence of assignments

1 message 2006/05/07

[#7840] Re: Coverity CID 14 15 Patch — ville.mattila@...

1 message 2006/05/07

[#7841] Re: Coverity CID 6 7 Appear to be false positives. — ville.mattila@...

1 message 2006/05/07

[#7842] XMLRPC support extended iso8601 DateTime Format — noreply@...

Bugs item #4382, was opened at 2006-05-07 21:51

1 message 2006/05/07

[#7843] Possible YAMl bug in 1.8.4 — Damphyr <damphyr@...>

OK, while parsing the td2 data from the ruby-lang website we stumbled on

10 messages 2006/05/08
[#7846] Re: Possible YAMl bug in 1.8.4 — "Curt Hibbs" <ml.chibbs@...> 2006/05/09

Its probably a bug. I'm not familiar with the specifics, but Ruby
[#7852] Re: Possible YAMl bug in 1.8.4 — MenTaLguY <mental@...> 2006/05/09

On Tue, 9 May 2006 10:51:54 +0900, "Curt Hibbs" <ml.chibbs@gmail.com> wrote:
[#7853] Re: Possible YAMl bug in 1.8.4 — "Curt Hibbs" <ml.chibbs@...> 2006/05/09

You can download it from here:
[#7854] Re: Possible YAMl bug in 1.8.4 — MenTaLguY <mental@...> 2006/05/09

On Wed, 10 May 2006 02:56:09 +0900, "Curt Hibbs" <ml.chibbs@gmail.com> wrote:
[#7849] Re: Possible YAMl bug in 1.8.4 — damphyr@... 2006/05/09

[#7850] Re: Possible YAMl bug in 1.8.4 — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2006/05/09

On May 9, 2006, at 7:20 AM, damphyr@freemail.gr wrote:
[#7855] Re: Possible YAMl bug in 1.8.4 — Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@...> 2006/05/09

On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 10:51:54AM +0900, Curt Hibbs wrote:
[#7857] Re: Possible YAMl bug in 1.8.4 — "Curt Hibbs" <ml.chibbs@...> 2006/05/09

On 5/9/06, Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@acm.org> wrote:
[#7861] Confirmed: YAML bug in 1.8.4 — why the lucky stiff <ruby-core@...> 2006/05/10

Mauricio Fernandez wrote:

[#7844] buggy tr_s in jcode — noreply@...

Bugs item #4391, was opened at 2006-05-08 22:34

2 messages 2006/05/08
[#7848] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-4391 ] buggy tr_s in jcode — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/05/09

Hi,

[#7845] Method call syntax — mathew <meta@...>

Just noticed someone had written this on wikipedia:

4 messages 2006/05/08
[#7847] Re: Method call syntax — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/05/09

Hi,
[#7851] Re: Method call syntax — James Edward Gray II <james@...> 2006/05/09

On May 9, 2006, at 12:10 AM, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#7856] Re: Method call syntax — Bertram Scharpf <lists@...> 2006/05/09

Hi,

[#7858] Ruby threads working with native threads — "Francis Cianfrocca" <garbagecat10@...>

I recently wrote a network-event extension for Ruby ("eventmachine" in

3 messages 2006/05/10
[#7859] Re: Ruby threads working with native threads — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/05/10

On May 10, 2006, at 9:43 AM, Francis Cianfrocca wrote:
[#7860] Re: Ruby threads working with native threads — "Francis Cianfrocca" <garbagecat10@...> 2006/05/10

Thanks, I'll look into that. What I wanted to do was call select(2) on a

[#7862] 650M process, huge stack trace — "Evan Phoenix" <evan@...>

I've been banging my head against the wall trying to figure out why

3 messages 2006/05/11
[#7863] Re: 650M process, huge stack trace — "Timothy J. Wood" <tjw@...> 2006/05/11

[#7864] Re: 650M process, huge stack trace — "Evan Phoenix" <evan@...> 2006/05/11

It's on linux 2.6. A modified debian box.

[#7865] Strange interactions between Struct and 'pp' — noreply@...

Bugs item #4457, was opened at 2006-05-12 17:13

5 messages 2006/05/12
[#7869] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-4457 ] Strange interactions between Struct and 'pp' — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2006/05/13

In article <200605121513.k4CFDWsl029144@rubyforge.org>,
[#7907] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-4457 ] Strange interactions between Struct and 'pp' — Tom Copeland <tom@...> 2006/05/18

On Sat, 2006-05-13 at 16:39 +0900, Tanaka Akira wrote:
[#7866] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-4457 ] Strange interactions between Struct and 'pp' — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/05/12

[#7871] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-4457 ] Strange interactions between Struct and 'pp' — Florian Gro<florgro@...> 2006/05/13

Eric Hodel wrote:

[#7867] performance enhancement for OpenSSL::Cipher::Cipher.update — noreply@...

Patches item #4463, was opened at 2006-05-13 06:55

1 message 2006/05/13

[#7868] Better error messages in OpenSSL::SSL.[accept, connect] — noreply@...

Patches item #4464, was opened at 2006-05-13 06:58

1 message 2006/05/13

[#7870] RDoc looks for doc headers at function prototypes — noreply@...

Bugs item #4467, was opened at 2006-05-13 13:50

1 message 2006/05/13

[#7872] Nonblocking socket-connect — "Francis Cianfrocca" <garbagecat10@...>

All, I needed a nonblocking socket connect for my asynchronous-event

18 messages 2006/05/14
[#7873] Re: Nonblocking socket-connect — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2006/05/14

In article <3a94cf510605140559l7baa0205le341dac4f47d424b@mail.gmail.com>,
[#7874] Re: Nonblocking socket-connect — "Francis Cianfrocca" <garbagecat10@...> 2006/05/15

How about introducing the method Socket#set_nonblocking, or alternatively
[#7875] Re: Nonblocking socket-connect — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/05/15

Hi,
[#7876] Re: Nonblocking socket-connect — "Francis Cianfrocca" <garbagecat10@...> 2006/05/15

Well, it's ok then. I'm comfortable adding in the nonblocking
[#7877] Re: Nonblocking socket-connect — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/05/15

Hi,
[#7880] Re: Nonblocking socket-connect — "Francis Cianfrocca" <garbagecat10@...> 2006/05/15

How about Socket#nbconnect and Socket#nbaccept?
[#7890] Re: Nonblocking socket-connect — "Vlad GALU" <vladgalu@...> 2006/05/17

On 5/15/06, Francis Cianfrocca <garbagecat10@gmail.com> wrote:
[#7893] Re: Nonblocking socket-connect — "Francis Cianfrocca" <garbagecat10@...> 2006/05/17

My opinion only, but when I see bang at the end of a method name, it makes
[#7894] Re: Nonblocking socket-connect — "Austin Ziegler" <halostatue@...> 2006/05/17

On 5/17/06, Francis Cianfrocca <garbagecat10@gmail.com> wrote:
[#7898] Re: Nonblocking socket-connect — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/05/17

On May 17, 2006, at 4:13 AM, Vlad GALU wrote:
[#7900] Re: Nonblocking socket-connect — ara.t.howard@... 2006/05/17

On Thu, 18 May 2006, Eric Hodel wrote:
[#7913] Re: Nonblocking socket-connect — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2006/05/20

In article <1147709691.180288.28647.nullmailer@x31.priv.netlab.jp>,
[#7914] Re: Nonblocking socket-connect — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/05/21

Hi,
[#7915] Re: Nonblocking socket-connect — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2006/05/21

Quoting matz@ruby-lang.org, on Sun, May 21, 2006 at 11:39:21PM +0900:
[#7916] Re: Nonblocking socket-connect — "Francis Cianfrocca" <garbagecat10@...> 2006/05/21

I also prefer *_nonblock.
[#7917] Re: Nonblocking socket-connect — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2006/05/22

In article <1148222367.676789.19888.nullmailer@x31.priv.netlab.jp>,
[#7918] Re: Nonblocking socket-connect — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/05/22

Hi,

[#7878] Re: Nonblocking socket-connect — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>

> -----Original Message-----

2 messages 2006/05/15
[#7879] Re: Nonblocking socket-connect — "Francis Cianfrocca" <garbagecat10@...> 2006/05/15

I have to admit, I seriously dislike AIO. In my experience, it only

[#7881] Segfault on x86_64 when built with -O0 in CFLAGS — noreply@...

Bugs item #4491, was opened at 2006-05-16 12:46

5 messages 2006/05/16
[#7886] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-4491 ] Segfault on x86_64 when built with -O0 in CFLAGS — ts <decoux@...> 2006/05/17

>>>>> "n" == noreply <noreply@rubyforge.org> writes:
[#7887] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-4491 ] Segfault on x86_64 when built with -O0 in CFLAGS — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/05/17

Hi,
[#7888] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-4491 ] Segfault on x86_64 when built with -O0 in CFLAGS — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/05/17

Hi,
[#7889] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-4491 ] Segfault on x86_64 when built with -O0 in CFLAGS — ts <decoux@...> 2006/05/17

>>>>> "Y" == Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> writes:

[#7882] reproducible bug in DRb on OSX — cremes.devlist@...

I've been tearing my hair out the last few days trying to track down

5 messages 2006/05/16
[#7883] Re: reproducible bug in DRb on OSX — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/05/16

On May 16, 2006, at 12:25 PM, cremes.devlist@mac.com wrote:
[#7884] Re: reproducible bug in DRb on OSX — cremes.devlist@... 2006/05/17

[#7885] Re: reproducible bug in DRb on OSX — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/05/17

On May 16, 2006, at 7:51 PM, cremes.devlist@mac.com wrote:
[#7897] Re: reproducible bug in DRb on OSX — Sam Roberts <sroberts@...> 2006/05/17

Quoting drbrain@segment7.net, on Wed, May 17, 2006 at 12:51:00PM +0900:

[#7891] raise can create custom exception objects which aren't properly initialized — noreply@...

Bugs item #4498, was opened at 2006-05-17 11:36

2 messages 2006/05/17
[#7892] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-4498 ] raise can create custom exception objects which aren't properly initialized — ts <decoux@...> 2006/05/17

>>>>> "n" == noreply <noreply@rubyforge.org> writes:

[#7895] Webrick: Missing -c parameter forces utf-8 even if with code page specified in meta tag — noreply@...

Bugs item #4500, was opened at 2006-05-17 16:44

2 messages 2006/05/17
[#7899] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-4500 ] Webrick: Missing -c parameter forces utf-8 even if with code page specified in meta tag — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/05/17

On May 17, 2006, at 7:44 AM, noreply@rubyforge.org wrote:

[#7896] Fwd: Bug: Time#-(1e-6) doesn't substract one microsecond. — Dave Burt <dave@...>

Hi,

1 message 2006/05/17

[#7901] String#nstrip ? — "Daniel Berger" <Daniel.Berger@...>

Hi all,

3 messages 2006/05/18
[#7903] Re: String#nstrip ? — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...> 2006/05/18

Daniel Berger wrote:
[#7904] Re: String#nstrip ? — ara.t.howard@... 2006/05/18

On Fri, 19 May 2006, Daniel Berger wrote:

[#7902] Re: String#nstrip ? — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>

> -----Original Message-----

1 message 2006/05/18

[#7905] Re: String#nstrip ? — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>

> -----Original Message-----

3 messages 2006/05/18
[#7906] Re: String#nstrip ? — brabuhr@... 2006/05/18

> > When using the Win32API package, I often have to resort to this idiom
[#7908] Re: String#nstrip ? — Carlos <angus@...> 2006/05/19

Getting STRING[0..(STRING.index(0.chr) || 0)-1]:

[#7909] SCRIPT_LINES__ issue when loading a file more than once — Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@...>

SCRIPT_LINES__ is an obscure feature very few people care about, but I happen

9 messages 2006/05/19
[#7947] Re: [PATCH] SCRIPT_LINES__ issue when loading a file more than once — Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@...> 2006/06/05

On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 06:46:05PM +0900, Mauricio Fernandez wrote:
[#7950] Re: [PATCH] SCRIPT_LINES__ issue when loading a file more than once — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/06/05

Hi,
[#7951] Re: [PATCH] SCRIPT_LINES__ issue when loading a file more than once — Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@...> 2006/06/05

On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 07:45:52AM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#7952] Re: [PATCH] SCRIPT_LINES__ issue when loading a file more than once — nobu@... 2006/06/06

Hi,
[#7953] Re: [PATCH] SCRIPT_LINES__ issue when loading a file more than once — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/06/06

Hi,
[#7956] Re: [PATCH] SCRIPT_LINES__ issue when loading a file more than once — nobu@... 2006/06/06

Hi,
[#7957] Re: [PATCH] SCRIPT_LINES__ issue when loading a file more than once — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/06/06

Hi,
[#7958] Re: [PATCH] SCRIPT_LINES__ issue when loading a file more than once — nobu@... 2006/06/06

Hi,

[#7910] Re: String#nstrip ? — "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>

1 message 2006/05/19

[#7919] Queue — "Francis Cianfrocca" <garbagecat10@...>

Any plans to provide Queue#unshift? Any reason not to?

1 message 2006/05/23

[#7920] Range "max" method does not handle Infinity — noreply@...

Bugs item #4555, was opened at 2006-05-24 04:37

3 messages 2006/05/24
[#7921] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-4555 ] Range "max" method does not handle Infinity — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/05/24

Hi,
[#7924] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-4555 ] Range "max" method does not handle Infinity — "C Erler" <erlercw@...> 2006/05/27

On 24/05/06, Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote:

[#7922] loading rubygems at startup without RUBYOPT — "Nobuyoshi Nakada" <nobu@...>

Hi,

2 messages 2006/05/26
[#8055] Re: loading rubygems at startup without RUBYOPT — nobu@... 2006/06/25

Hi,

[#7923] Nonblocking accept — "Francis Cianfrocca" <garbagecat10@...>

Thanks to the Matz and colleagues for adding the *_nonblock functions. They

3 messages 2006/05/26
[#7925] Re: Nonblocking accept — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2006/05/27

In article <3a94cf510605260529x658e20e1q7d9754266675c3d5@mail.gmail.com>,
[#7926] Re: Nonblocking accept — "Francis Cianfrocca" <garbagecat10@...> 2006/05/27

Thanks for the patch, I'll test as soon as I can. In regard to datagrams,

[#7928] set_trace_func: binding has wrong self value for return events — =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Florian_Gro=DF?= <florgro@...>

Moin.

6 messages 2006/05/27
[#7963] Re: [Bug?] set_trace_func: binding has wrong self value for return events — =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Florian_Gro=DF?= <florgro@...> 2006/06/06

Florian Growrote:
[#7964] Re: [Bug?] set_trace_func: binding has wrong self value for return events — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/06/07

Hi,
[#7968] Re: [Bug?] set_trace_func: binding has wrong self value for return events — Florian Gross <florgro@...> 2006/06/07

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#7969] Re: [Bug?] set_trace_func: binding has wrong self value for return events — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/06/07

Hi,
[#7970] Re: [Bug?] set_trace_func: binding has wrong self value for return events — Florian Gross <florgro@...> 2006/06/07

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#7929] RDoc --force flag — Vincent Fourmond <vincent.fourmond@9online.fr>

1 message 2006/05/27

[#7930] FOR SALE:nokia 8800,6600,n92,91,90,80,70 and Plas EDTV samsung at just $200 — noreply@...

Bugs item #4601, was opened at 2006-05-29 17:35

2 messages 2006/05/29
[#7932] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-4601 ] FOR SALE:nokia 8800,6600,n92,91,90,80,70 and Plas EDTV samsung at just $200 — Tom Copeland <tom@...> 2006/05/30

On Tue, 2006-05-30 at 02:35 +0900, noreply@rubyforge.org wrote:

[#7931] Critical 1.9 mathn bug (require 'mathn' failure) — noreply@...

Bugs item #4605, was opened at 2006-05-29 18:40

2 messages 2006/05/29
[#7933] Re: [ ruby-Bugs-4605 ] Critical 1.9 mathn bug (require 'mathn' failure) — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/05/30

Hi,

[#7934] round trip failure with YAML; both ruby_1_8 and HEAD — Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@...>

I caught syck corrupting data once again, and traced it down to this:

2 messages 2006/05/31
[#7935] Re: [BUG] round trip failure with YAML; both ruby_1_8 and HEAD — MenTaLguY <mental@...> 2006/05/31

On Thu, 1 Jun 2006 00:25:26 +0900, Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@acm.org> wrote:

Method call syntax

From: mathew <meta@...>
Date: 2006-05-08 20:48:13 UTC
List: ruby-core #7845 
Just noticed someone had written this on wikipedia:

"Omission of parentheses around method arguments may lead to unexpected 
results. Note that the Ruby developers have stated that omission of 
parentheses may be disallowed in future Ruby versions..."

Is this true? I've been unable to find any reference to the alleged 
unexpected results.


mathew

In This Thread

Prev Next