[#7872] Nonblocking socket-connect — "Francis Cianfrocca" <garbagecat10@...>

All, I needed a nonblocking socket connect for my asynchronous-event

18 messages 2006/05/14
[#7873] Re: Nonblocking socket-connect — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2006/05/14

In article <3a94cf510605140559l7baa0205le341dac4f47d424b@mail.gmail.com>,

[#7874] Re: Nonblocking socket-connect — "Francis Cianfrocca" <garbagecat10@...> 2006/05/15

How about introducing the method Socket#set_nonblocking, or alternatively

[#7875] Re: Nonblocking socket-connect — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/05/15

Hi,

[#7876] Re: Nonblocking socket-connect — "Francis Cianfrocca" <garbagecat10@...> 2006/05/15

Well, it's ok then. I'm comfortable adding in the nonblocking

[#7877] Re: Nonblocking socket-connect — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/05/15

Hi,

[BUG] segfault on Proc#call after setting a trace_func

From: Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@...>
Date: 2006-05-06 10:33:43 UTC
List: ruby-core #7833
$ cat bug2.rb 
set_trace_func proc{}
l = lambda{}
l.call
$ ruby19 bug2.rb 
bug2.rb:3: [BUG] Segmentation fault
ruby 1.9.0 (2006-05-01) [i686-linux]

Aborted

[ruby-talk:191639]

-- 
Mauricio Fernandez  -   http://eigenclass.org   -  singular Ruby

In This Thread

Prev Next