[#7809] uninit bug in yaml/emitter.c — "Pat Eyler" <rubypate@...>
During our hacking night, we also looked at an UNINIT bug in yaml/emitter.c
[#7813] :!~ not a symbol — noreply@...
Bugs item #4344, was opened at 2006-05-03 17:41
[#7818] (security-related) patch to ALLOC macros to prevent integer overflow bugs — "Dominique Brezinski" <dominique.brezinski@...>
While fixing the integer overflow in rb_ary_fill(), it occurred to me
[#7833] segfault on Proc#call after setting a trace_func — Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@...>
$ cat bug2.rb
[#7843] Possible YAMl bug in 1.8.4 — Damphyr <damphyr@...>
OK, while parsing the td2 data from the ruby-lang website we stumbled on
Its probably a bug. I'm not familiar with the specifics, but Ruby
[#7858] Ruby threads working with native threads — "Francis Cianfrocca" <garbagecat10@...>
I recently wrote a network-event extension for Ruby ("eventmachine" in
[#7865] Strange interactions between Struct and 'pp' — noreply@...
Bugs item #4457, was opened at 2006-05-12 17:13
[#7872] Nonblocking socket-connect — "Francis Cianfrocca" <garbagecat10@...>
All, I needed a nonblocking socket connect for my asynchronous-event
In article <3a94cf510605140559l7baa0205le341dac4f47d424b@mail.gmail.com>,
How about introducing the method Socket#set_nonblocking, or alternatively
Hi,
Well, it's ok then. I'm comfortable adding in the nonblocking
Hi,
How about Socket#nbconnect and Socket#nbaccept?
On 5/15/06, Francis Cianfrocca <garbagecat10@gmail.com> wrote:
In article <1147709691.180288.28647.nullmailer@x31.priv.netlab.jp>,
[#7881] Segfault on x86_64 when built with -O0 in CFLAGS — noreply@...
Bugs item #4491, was opened at 2006-05-16 12:46
[#7882] reproducible bug in DRb on OSX — cremes.devlist@...
I've been tearing my hair out the last few days trying to track down
[#7909] SCRIPT_LINES__ issue when loading a file more than once — Mauricio Fernandez <mfp@...>
SCRIPT_LINES__ is an obscure feature very few people care about, but I happen
On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 06:46:05PM +0900, Mauricio Fernandez wrote:
Hi,
[#7923] Nonblocking accept — "Francis Cianfrocca" <garbagecat10@...>
Thanks to the Matz and colleagues for adding the *_nonblock functions. They
[#7928] set_trace_func: binding has wrong self value for return events — =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Florian_Gro=DF?= <florgro@...>
Moin.
Florian Growrote:
Re: Method call syntax
On May 9, 2006, at 12:10 AM, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In message "Re: Method call syntax"
> on Tue, 9 May 2006 05:48:13 +0900, mathew <meta@pobox.com> writes:
>
> |"Omission of parentheses around method arguments may lead to
> unexpected
> |results. Note that the Ruby developers have stated that omission of
> |parentheses may be disallowed in future Ruby versions..."
> |
> |Is this true? I've been unable to find any reference to the alleged
> |unexpected results.
>
> It's in fact:
>
> Omission of parentheses around method arguments for method calls in
> the argument list may make programs hard to read / parse.
>
> for example,
>
> p sprintf "the answer=%d\n",42
>
> warns like "warning: parenthesize argument(s) for future version", and
> recommended code should be
>
> p sprintf("the answer=%d\n",42)
But you are still planning to allow them to be dropped in the non-
ambiguous cases, right? I notice you didn't add parenthesis to the p
call above and I think it would be sad if we had to start writing:
whatever.dup()
James Edward Gray II