[#7872] Nonblocking socket-connect — "Francis Cianfrocca" <garbagecat10@...>

All, I needed a nonblocking socket connect for my asynchronous-event

18 messages 2006/05/14
[#7873] Re: Nonblocking socket-connect — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2006/05/14

In article <3a94cf510605140559l7baa0205le341dac4f47d424b@mail.gmail.com>,

[#7874] Re: Nonblocking socket-connect — "Francis Cianfrocca" <garbagecat10@...> 2006/05/15

How about introducing the method Socket#set_nonblocking, or alternatively

[#7875] Re: Nonblocking socket-connect — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/05/15

Hi,

[#7876] Re: Nonblocking socket-connect — "Francis Cianfrocca" <garbagecat10@...> 2006/05/15

Well, it's ok then. I'm comfortable adding in the nonblocking

[#7877] Re: Nonblocking socket-connect — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/05/15

Hi,

[ ruby-Bugs-4467 ] RDoc looks for doc headers at function prototypes

From: noreply@...
Date: 2006-05-13 11:50:04 UTC
List: ruby-core #7870
Bugs item #4467, was opened at 2006-05-13 13:50
You can respond by visiting: 
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1698&aid=4467&group_id=426

Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Tilman Sauerbeck (tilman)
Assigned to: Nobody (None)
Summary: RDoc looks for doc headers at function prototypes

Initial Comment:
RDoc looks for documentation chunks at function prototypes, too.

So if you have the snippet of code below, it won't work correctly.
I expect RDoc to pick up the doc header from the implementation of the function, not from the prototype.

Here's the example code:

static VALUE some_prototype (...);

/* more code */

/*
 * call-seq: ..
 * ...
 */
static VALUE
some_prototype (actually_the_implementation)
{
   ...
}

----------------------------------------------------------------------

You can respond by visiting: 
http://rubyforge.org/tracker/?func=detail&atid=1698&aid=4467&group_id=426

In This Thread

Prev Next