[#7978] Patch for Unix socket peer credentials — "James F. Hranicky" <jfh@...>

This patch adds support for getting the uid and gid of the peer

27 messages 2006/06/09
[#8004] Re: Patch for Unix socket peer credentials — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2006/06/16

In article <200606091528.30171.jfh@cise.ufl.edu>,

[#8005] Re: Patch for Unix socket peer credentials — "James F. Hranicky" <jfh@...> 2006/06/16

On Friday 16 June 2006 11:51, Tanaka Akira wrote:

[#8010] Re: Patch for Unix socket peer credentials — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2006/06/17

In article <200606161327.35948.jfh@cise.ufl.edu>,

[#8191] Re: Patch for Unix socket peer credentials — "James F. Hranicky" <jfh@...> 2006/07/10

On Saturday 17 June 2006 06:27, Tanaka Akira wrote:

[#8193] Re: Patch for Unix socket peer credentials — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2006/07/11

In article <200607101352.16804.jfh@cise.ufl.edu>,

[#8212] Re: Patch for Unix socket peer credentials — "James F. Hranicky" <jfh@...> 2006/07/13

On Tuesday 11 July 2006 00:10, Tanaka Akira wrote:

[#8217] Re: Patch for Unix socket peer credentials — nobu@... 2006/07/14

Hi,

[#8257] Re: Patch for Unix socket peer credentials — "James F. Hranicky" <jfh@...> 2006/07/18

On Thursday 13 July 2006 22:48, nobu@ruby-lang.org wrote:

[#8258] Re: Patch for Unix socket peer credentials — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/07/18

On Jul 18, 2006, at 12:27 PM, James F. Hranicky wrote:

[#8073] 1.8.5p1 build failure on Solaris 10 — "Daniel Berger" <Daniel.Berger@...>

Solaris 10

23 messages 2006/06/27
[#8074] Re: 1.8.5p1 build failure on Solaris 10 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/06/28

Hi,

[#8078] Re: 1.8.5p1 build failure on Solaris 10 — "Daniel Berger" <Daniel.Berger@...> 2006/06/28

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#8079] Re: 1.8.5p1 build failure on Solaris 10 — ts <decoux@...> 2006/06/28

>>>>> "D" == Daniel Berger <Daniel.Berger@qwest.com> writes:

[#8096] Re: 1.8.5p1 build failure on Solaris 10 — ville.mattila@... 2006/06/29

ts <decoux@moulon.inra.fr> wrote on 28.06.2006 17:37:00:

Re: [Bug?] set_trace_func: binding has wrong self value for return events

From: Florian Gross <florgro@...>
Date: 2006-06-07 13:39:32 UTC
List: ruby-core #7970
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

>> [up-level binding]
> I want to make sure that this is a totally different story from
> set_trace_func, OK?

Yup, that makes a lot of sense.

> Once I had discussed this issue of up-level binding with ko1 (the YARV
> guy) and he said it is possible to implement it.  The only two reason
> I didn't implement it are a) I didn't have good API idea, 

Would binding(n) be good enough? It's not very fancy, but seems like a 
natural extension of what is already there.

> and b) it
> might restrict the future implementation especially YARV.  Since he
> said it didn't affect the performance, you will be able to have it in
> the future - on Christmas, in some distant year ;-)

Thanks a *lot*! That *is* very reassuring.

So I'll just have to find another workaround that doesn't exploit an 
obscure Ruby bug until then... Oh well... :)

-- 
http://flgr.0x42.net/


In This Thread

Prev Next