[#7708] Bug in libsnmp-ruby1.8 — Hadmut Danisch <hadmut@...>

Hi,

8 messages 2006/04/11
[#7709] Re: Bug in libsnmp-ruby1.8 — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/04/11

On Apr 11, 2006, at 6:23 AM, Hadmut Danisch wrote:

[#7770] Re: possible defect in array.c — "Brown, Warren" <warrenbrown@...>

> rb_range_beg_len (in range.c) does set beg and len.

13 messages 2006/04/26
[#7771] Re: possible defect in array.c — "Pat Eyler" <rubypate@...> 2006/04/26

On 4/26/06, Brown, Warren <warrenbrown@aquire.com> wrote:

Re: site_ruby or not site_ruby

From: mathew <meta@...>
Date: 2006-04-11 19:37:26 UTC
List: ruby-core #7715
Marcus Rueckert wrote:
> that might be ... but atm i dont see a better solution. how would you
> otherwise differ between user installed and distro installed libraries?

Surely that's a question for the distro maintainers?

Based how on prior discussion of packaging systems went, there's little 
hope of them playing by any rules or guidelines the Ruby developers may 
set, so you might as well ask them directly what their policy is.


mathew

In This Thread

Prev Next