[#7708] Bug in libsnmp-ruby1.8 — Hadmut Danisch <hadmut@...>

Hi,

8 messages 2006/04/11
[#7709] Re: Bug in libsnmp-ruby1.8 — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/04/11

On Apr 11, 2006, at 6:23 AM, Hadmut Danisch wrote:

[#7770] Re: possible defect in array.c — "Brown, Warren" <warrenbrown@...>

> rb_range_beg_len (in range.c) does set beg and len.

13 messages 2006/04/26
[#7771] Re: possible defect in array.c — "Pat Eyler" <rubypate@...> 2006/04/26

On 4/26/06, Brown, Warren <warrenbrown@aquire.com> wrote:

Re: readpartial not working on ARM

From: Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org>
Date: 2006-04-18 01:53:23 UTC
List: ruby-core #7730
In article <4443534E.5030303@path.berkeley.edu>,
  Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@path.berkeley.edu> writes:

> Hi. IO#readpartial seems to be broken on ARM (Intel XScale, gumstix),
> and this is causing telnet to hang. The problem is that readpartial(n)
> hangs until all n bytes are received. I've tested this with TCPSockets.
>
> Any suggestions for me to try next? What might be misconfigured?
>
> Gumstix use uClibc (http://www.busybox.net/) rather than GNU libc.
>
> This is with ruby-1.8.4.

I guess READ_DATA_PENDING is not defined properly because
uClibc.

If my guess is right, ruby 1.9 should work well.
ruby 1.9 has its own buffering mechanism to avoid stdio
buffering.
-- 
Tanaka Akira

In This Thread