[#7653] parse.y: literal strings for tokens — Robin Stocker <robin@...>
Hi,
Hi,
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#7674] Re: [PATCH] parse.y: literal strings for tokens — ville.mattila@...
ville.mattila@stonesoft.com wrote:
Hi again,
Hi,
[#7692] Socket Documentation commit ? — zdennis <zdennis@...>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
[#7708] Bug in libsnmp-ruby1.8 — Hadmut Danisch <hadmut@...>
Hi,
On Apr 11, 2006, at 6:23 AM, Hadmut Danisch wrote:
On 2006-04-12 02:04:32 +0900, Eric Hodel wrote:
On Apr 11, 2006, at 10:20 AM, Marcus Rueckert wrote:
[#7721] Ruby mentor in Googe's Summer of Code — "Evan Phoenix" <evan@...>
We missed out on it last year, so lets this year try to get ruby
[#7725] readpartial not working on ARM — Joel VanderWerf <vjoel@...>
[#7727] Stack trace doesn't include class — noreply@...
Bugs item #4151, was opened at 2006-04-17 23:10
On Apr 17, 2006, at 1:11 PM, noreply@rubyforge.org wrote:
On Wed, 19 Apr 2006, Eric Hodel wrote:
Hi --
[#7729] xmlrpc and charset=utf-8 — "Phil Tomson" <rubyfan@...>
I'm needed to interact with an XMLRPC server written using the
>>>>> On Sun, 18 Jun 2006 12:00:19 +0900
I first sent this from the wrong email account, so if that post somehow makes
On 6/19/06, Sean Russell <ser@germane-software.com> wrote:
[#7738] RDoc patches for GetoptLong — mathew <meta@...>
I added RDoc documentation to GetoptLong. The patches are attached. As
[#7744] Coverity Scan — "Pat Eyler" <rubypate@...>
I don't know if anyone else has signed up for access to the coverity
[#7765] possible defect in array.c — "Pat Eyler" <rubypate@...>
This one may be a false positive, I'm not sure. If it is, I'll happily mark
On 4/25/06, Pat Eyler <rubypate@gmail.com> wrote:
[#7770] Re: possible defect in array.c — "Brown, Warren" <warrenbrown@...>
> rb_range_beg_len (in range.c) does set beg and len.
On 4/26/06, Brown, Warren <warrenbrown@aquire.com> wrote:
On 4/26/06, Pat Eyler <rubypate@gmail.com> wrote:
On 4/26/06, Jacob Fugal <lukfugl@gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 01:15:24AM +0900, Pat Eyler wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 27, 2006 at 09:41:00AM +0900, Nobuyoshi Nakada wrote:
[#7799] Patch: code-cleanup (k&r style) — Stefan Huehner <stefan@...>
Hi,
Hi,
Re: [ ruby-Bugs-4151 ] Stack trace doesn't include class
On Apr 17, 2006, at 1:11 PM, noreply@rubyforge.org wrote: > Bugs item #4151, was opened at 2006-04-17 23:10 > You can respond by visiting: > http://rubyforge.org/tracker/? > func=detail&atid=1698&aid=4151&group_id=426 > > Category: None > Group: None > Status: Open > Resolution: None > Priority: 3 > Submitted By: Oren Ben-Kiki (oren) > Assigned to: Nobody (None) > Summary: Stack trace doesn't include class > > Initial Comment: > The stack trace provided by the Ruby engine uses a hard-wired > template including the source file name, line number and the name > of the method. For some reason, it doesn't contain the name of the > class containing the method. I don't understand how just a file name and line number are ambiguous when reading a backtrace. > A lot of Ruby functionality is provided as extensions to the > standard library, where it makes sense to have one file per class > (more or less). This compensates for the above lack to a great extent. > > However, it also makes sense to write straight scripts in Ruby. In > my case, quite an involved script that contains many classes, but > is still a single file I can easily distribute to users etc. In > this case, the lack of the class name in the stack trace is rather > limiting. Adding the class may be misleading. A method may belong to an object but not the object's class. -- Eric Hodel - drbrain@segment7.net - http://blog.segment7.net This implementation is HODEL-HASH-9600 compliant http://trackmap.robotcoop.com