[#7708] Bug in libsnmp-ruby1.8 — Hadmut Danisch <hadmut@...>

Hi,

8 messages 2006/04/11
[#7709] Re: Bug in libsnmp-ruby1.8 — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/04/11

On Apr 11, 2006, at 6:23 AM, Hadmut Danisch wrote:

[#7770] Re: possible defect in array.c — "Brown, Warren" <warrenbrown@...>

> rb_range_beg_len (in range.c) does set beg and len.

13 messages 2006/04/26
[#7771] Re: possible defect in array.c — "Pat Eyler" <rubypate@...> 2006/04/26

On 4/26/06, Brown, Warren <warrenbrown@aquire.com> wrote:

Re: site_ruby or not site_ruby (was: Re: Bug in libsnmp-ruby1.8)

From: Marcus Rueckert <mrueckert@...>
Date: 2006-04-11 18:14:37 UTC
List: ruby-core #7713
On 2006-04-12 02:45:07 +0900, Eric Hodel wrote:
> On Apr 11, 2006, at 10:20 AM, Marcus Rueckert wrote:
> 
> >On 2006-04-12 02:04:32 +0900, Eric Hodel wrote:
> >>This package was installed incorrectly.  Third party ruby packages go
> >>in /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/
> >
> >from a distributors point of view i would leave the site_ruby part for
> >packages installed by an user. so you can differ between distro  
> >packaged
> >libraries and user installed libraries. in perl you have the vendor  
> >dir
> >for that. but that is missing in ruby so far. so i think putting them
> >into the main dir is the better choice atm.
> 
> rbconfig.rb disagrees with you.

that might be ... but atm i dont see a better solution. how would you
otherwise differ between user installed and distro installed libraries?

darix

-- 
          openSUSE - SUSE Linux is my linux
              openSUSE is good for you
                  www.opensuse.org

In This Thread