From: Marcus Rueckert <mrueckert@...>
Date: 2006-04-12T03:14:37+09:00
Subject: Re: site_ruby or not site_ruby (was: Re: Bug in libsnmp-ruby1.8)

On 2006-04-12 02:45:07 +0900, Eric Hodel wrote:
> On Apr 11, 2006, at 10:20 AM, Marcus Rueckert wrote:
> 
> >On 2006-04-12 02:04:32 +0900, Eric Hodel wrote:
> >>This package was installed incorrectly.  Third party ruby packages go
> >>in /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/
> >
> >from a distributors point of view i would leave the site_ruby part for
> >packages installed by an user. so you can differ between distro  
> >packaged
> >libraries and user installed libraries. in perl you have the vendor  
> >dir
> >for that. but that is missing in ruby so far. so i think putting them
> >into the main dir is the better choice atm.
> 
> rbconfig.rb disagrees with you.

that might be ... but atm i dont see a better solution. how would you
otherwise differ between user installed and distro installed libraries?

darix

-- 
          openSUSE - SUSE Linux is my linux
              openSUSE is good for you
                  www.opensuse.org