[#7708] Bug in libsnmp-ruby1.8 — Hadmut Danisch <hadmut@...>

Hi,

8 messages 2006/04/11
[#7709] Re: Bug in libsnmp-ruby1.8 — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/04/11

On Apr 11, 2006, at 6:23 AM, Hadmut Danisch wrote:

[#7770] Re: possible defect in array.c — "Brown, Warren" <warrenbrown@...>

> rb_range_beg_len (in range.c) does set beg and len.

13 messages 2006/04/26
[#7771] Re: possible defect in array.c — "Pat Eyler" <rubypate@...> 2006/04/26

On 4/26/06, Brown, Warren <warrenbrown@aquire.com> wrote:

Re: possible defect in array.c

From: "Nobuyoshi Nakada" <nobu@...>
Date: 2006-04-27 02:55:17 UTC
List: ruby-core #7783
Hi,

2006/4/27, Sam Roberts <sroberts@uniserve.com>:
> Are you sure? It appears to support non-standard extensions in both C99
> and C89 dialects. I'm not complaining, the extensions are useful, but
> just because gcc compiled it doesn't mean its standard C, of any
> particular dialect.

Well, you're correct it has its own extensions not only C99 and C89
standards, and you need -pedaintic-errors option to let gcc be strict
with them.  But it doesn't croak if -std=c99 is also given, and I
thought it is the default in gcc4, IIRC.
I meant that change about the based standards.

--
Nobu Nakada


In This Thread