[#7708] Bug in libsnmp-ruby1.8 — Hadmut Danisch <hadmut@...>

Hi,

8 messages 2006/04/11
[#7709] Re: Bug in libsnmp-ruby1.8 — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/04/11

On Apr 11, 2006, at 6:23 AM, Hadmut Danisch wrote:

[#7770] Re: possible defect in array.c — "Brown, Warren" <warrenbrown@...>

> rb_range_beg_len (in range.c) does set beg and len.

13 messages 2006/04/26
[#7771] Re: possible defect in array.c — "Pat Eyler" <rubypate@...> 2006/04/26

On 4/26/06, Brown, Warren <warrenbrown@aquire.com> wrote:

Re: site_ruby or not site_ruby (was: Re: Bug in libsnmp-ruby1.8)

From: "Austin Ziegler" <halostatue@...>
Date: 2006-04-11 18:03:51 UTC
List: ruby-core #7712
On 4/11/06, Marcus Rueckert <mrueckert@suse.de> wrote:> On 2006-04-12 02:04:32 +0900, Eric Hodel wrote:> > This package was installed incorrectly.  Third party ruby packages go> > in /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/> from a distributors point of view i would leave the site_ruby part for> packages installed by an user. so you can differ between distro packaged> libraries and user installed libraries. in perl you have the vendor dir> for that. but that is missing in ruby so far. so i think putting them> into the main dir is the better choice atm.
site_ruby is for things that aren't part of the standard Ruby library.No more, no less.
-austin--Austin Ziegler * halostatue@gmail.com               * Alternate: austin@halostatue.ca

In This Thread