From: Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>
Date: 2006-04-12T02:45:07+09:00
Subject: Re: site_ruby or not site_ruby (was: Re: Bug in libsnmp-ruby1.8)

On Apr 11, 2006, at 10:20 AM, Marcus Rueckert wrote:

> On 2006-04-12 02:04:32 +0900, Eric Hodel wrote:
>> This package was installed incorrectly.  Third party ruby packages go
>> in /usr/lib/ruby/site_ruby/1.8/
>
> from a distributors point of view i would leave the site_ruby part for
> packages installed by an user. so you can differ between distro  
> packaged
> libraries and user installed libraries. in perl you have the vendor  
> dir
> for that. but that is missing in ruby so far. so i think putting them
> into the main dir is the better choice atm.

rbconfig.rb disagrees with you.

-- 
Eric Hodel - drbrain@segment7.net - http://blog.segment7.net
This implementation is HODEL-HASH-9600 compliant

http://trackmap.robotcoop.com