[#7708] Bug in libsnmp-ruby1.8 — Hadmut Danisch <hadmut@...>

Hi,

8 messages 2006/04/11
[#7709] Re: Bug in libsnmp-ruby1.8 — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/04/11

On Apr 11, 2006, at 6:23 AM, Hadmut Danisch wrote:

[#7770] Re: possible defect in array.c — "Brown, Warren" <warrenbrown@...>

> rb_range_beg_len (in range.c) does set beg and len.

13 messages 2006/04/26
[#7771] Re: possible defect in array.c — "Pat Eyler" <rubypate@...> 2006/04/26

On 4/26/06, Brown, Warren <warrenbrown@aquire.com> wrote:

Re: readpartial not working on ARM

From: ara.t.howard@...
Date: 2006-04-18 02:47:31 UTC
List: ruby-core #7731
On Tue, 18 Apr 2006, Tanaka Akira wrote:

> I guess READ_DATA_PENDING is not defined properly because uClibc.
>
> If my guess is right, ruby 1.9 should work well.  ruby 1.9 has its own
> buffering mechanism to avoid stdio buffering.

hi tanaka-

i think we all know about stdio fairly well, but i sure would love to have
some insight into the buffering in 1.9 and how it's superior.  can you suggest
any reading/links for the rest of us?

kind regards.

-a
-- 
be kind whenever possible... it is always possible.
- h.h. the 14th dali lama

In This Thread