[#7955] Failing tests in ruby since 1.8.2 — "Caleb Tennis" <caleb@...>
The following tests have been failing in Ruby for a long time, including
[#7978] Patch for Unix socket peer credentials — "James F. Hranicky" <jfh@...>
This patch adds support for getting the uid and gid of the peer
In article <200606091528.30171.jfh@cise.ufl.edu>,
On Friday 16 June 2006 11:51, Tanaka Akira wrote:
In article <200606161327.35948.jfh@cise.ufl.edu>,
On Saturday 17 June 2006 06:27, Tanaka Akira wrote:
In article <200607101352.16804.jfh@cise.ufl.edu>,
On Tuesday 11 July 2006 00:10, Tanaka Akira wrote:
Hi,
On Thursday 13 July 2006 22:48, nobu@ruby-lang.org wrote:
On Jul 18, 2006, at 12:27 PM, James F. Hranicky wrote:
On Tuesday 18 July 2006 15:52, Eric Hodel wrote:
[#7994] Ruby Kaigi date confusion — "Charles O Nutter" <headius@...>
I'm quite confused by the dates I have seen reported on various Ruby Kaigi
[#8013] Download page on ruby-lang has numeric URL — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...>
This is off-topic to ruby-core, but possibly core to ruby's uptake:
On Jun 19, 2006, at 3:32 AM, Hugh Sasse wrote:
[#8038] bug in $. ? — Wybo Dekker <wybo@...>
wybo>cat t
Wybo Dekker schrieb:
Pit Capitain wrote:
[#8050] Thank-you to the Rails Core Team — Dave Teare <devlists-ruby-core@...>
While we were listening to Dave Thomas' Keynote address today at
[#8061] Win32 Extension Issues Wanted! — "Austin Ziegler" <halostatue@...>
Everyone. I had a conversation with folks from Microsoft today about
[#8065] Core documentation patches — Alex Young <alex@...>
Hi there,
Hi,
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#8073] 1.8.5p1 build failure on Solaris 10 — "Daniel Berger" <Daniel.Berger@...>
Solaris 10
Hi,
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
>>>>> "D" == Daniel Berger <Daniel.Berger@qwest.com> writes:
ts <decoux@moulon.inra.fr> wrote on 28.06.2006 17:37:00:
Hi,
Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote on 29.06.2006 20:02:11:
Hi,
Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote on 29.06.2006 20:53:20:
ville.mattila@stonesoft.com wrote:
[#8087] optparse.rb to RDoc documentation patch — <noreply@...>
Patches item #4879, was opened at 2006-06-28 20:50
On Jun 28, 2006, at 11:50 AM, <noreply@rubyforge.org>
[#8102] Reorganizing configure.in by platform? — "Daniel Berger" <Daniel.Berger@...>
Hi,
Re: xmlrpc and charset=utf-8
--- Phil Tomson <rubyfan@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm needed to interact with an XMLRPC server written
> using the
> xmlrpc-c library for C/C++. I was using Ruby 1.8.4
> and found that I
> could not get a simple xmlrpc client written in Ruby
> that would
> communicate with the xmlrpc-c server.
>
> I kept getting the following error:
> /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/xmlrpc/client.rb:547:in
> `do_rpc':
> HTTP-Error: 400 Bad Request (RuntimeError)
> from
> /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/xmlrpc/client.rb:420:in
> `call2'
> from
> /usr/local/lib/ruby/1.8/xmlrpc/client.rb:410:in
> `call'
> from littleclient.rb:7
>
>
> I tried downgrading to Ruby 1.8.2 and it worked
> fine.
>
> When I investigated the difference I found the
> following in the
> xmlrpc/client.rb file that comes with Ruby 1.8.4:
> def do_rpc(request, async=false)
> header = {
> "User-Agent" => USER_AGENT,
> "Content-Type" => "text/xml;
> charset=utf-8",
> "Content-Length" => request.size.to_s,
> "Connection" => (async ? "close" :
> "keep-alive")
> }
>
> This differs from the client.rb included with Ruby
> 1.8.2:
>
> def do_rpc(request, async=false)
> header = {
> "User-Agent" => USER_AGENT,
> "Content-Type" => "text/xml ",
> "Content-Length" => request.size.to_s,
> "Connection" => (async ? "close" :
> "keep-alive")
> }
>
> so I changed the code in the 1.8.4 version of
> client.rb to remove the
> "charset=utf-8" - after that the ruby client
> interacted fine with the
> xmlrpc-c server.
>
> I'm wondering if utf-8 should be the default charset
> for Ruby's xmlrpc
> client implementation? Also, I'm wondering if
> perhaps it could be
> selectable by adding an accessor method to the
> client to the Client
> class?
>
> Phil
Was this ever addressed? I vote for both a default of
utf8 and an accessor method.
Regards,
Dan
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com