[#7978] Patch for Unix socket peer credentials — "James F. Hranicky" <jfh@...>

This patch adds support for getting the uid and gid of the peer

27 messages 2006/06/09
[#8004] Re: Patch for Unix socket peer credentials — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2006/06/16

In article <200606091528.30171.jfh@cise.ufl.edu>,

[#8005] Re: Patch for Unix socket peer credentials — "James F. Hranicky" <jfh@...> 2006/06/16

On Friday 16 June 2006 11:51, Tanaka Akira wrote:

[#8010] Re: Patch for Unix socket peer credentials — Tanaka Akira <akr@...17n.org> 2006/06/17

In article <200606161327.35948.jfh@cise.ufl.edu>,

[#8191] Re: Patch for Unix socket peer credentials — "James F. Hranicky" <jfh@...> 2006/07/10

On Saturday 17 June 2006 06:27, Tanaka Akira wrote:

[#8193] Re: Patch for Unix socket peer credentials — Tanaka Akira <akr@...> 2006/07/11

In article <200607101352.16804.jfh@cise.ufl.edu>,

[#8212] Re: Patch for Unix socket peer credentials — "James F. Hranicky" <jfh@...> 2006/07/13

On Tuesday 11 July 2006 00:10, Tanaka Akira wrote:

[#8217] Re: Patch for Unix socket peer credentials — nobu@... 2006/07/14

Hi,

[#8257] Re: Patch for Unix socket peer credentials — "James F. Hranicky" <jfh@...> 2006/07/18

On Thursday 13 July 2006 22:48, nobu@ruby-lang.org wrote:

[#8258] Re: Patch for Unix socket peer credentials — Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net> 2006/07/18

On Jul 18, 2006, at 12:27 PM, James F. Hranicky wrote:

[#8073] 1.8.5p1 build failure on Solaris 10 — "Daniel Berger" <Daniel.Berger@...>

Solaris 10

23 messages 2006/06/27
[#8074] Re: 1.8.5p1 build failure on Solaris 10 — Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@...> 2006/06/28

Hi,

[#8078] Re: 1.8.5p1 build failure on Solaris 10 — "Daniel Berger" <Daniel.Berger@...> 2006/06/28

Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:

[#8079] Re: 1.8.5p1 build failure on Solaris 10 — ts <decoux@...> 2006/06/28

>>>>> "D" == Daniel Berger <Daniel.Berger@qwest.com> writes:

[#8096] Re: 1.8.5p1 build failure on Solaris 10 — ville.mattila@... 2006/06/29

ts <decoux@moulon.inra.fr> wrote on 28.06.2006 17:37:00:

Re: Segfault in rb_ary_push, ruby 1.8.4 (2005-12-24) [powerpc-openbsd3.8]

From: Eric Hodel <drbrain@...7.net>
Date: 2006-06-26 21:06:22 UTC
List: ruby-core #8059
On Jun 26, 2006, at 12:40 PM, Sam Stephenson wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I have a Ruby script that segfaults after a few days with:
>
>  ./script/../lib/cardinal/handler.rb:30: [BUG] Segmentation fault
>  ruby 1.8.4 (2005-12-24) [powerpc-openbsd3.8]
>
> The line in question is:
>
> 29      def handles_response?(method)
> 30        public_methods.grep(method.to_s).first
> 31      end
>
> A complete backtrace follows.  Hope this helps.  (I've not yet tried
> to reproduce the bug in 1.8.5-preview1.)

Do you have a script to reproduce this?  Three lines of ruby aren't  
(sometimes) enough.

> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> rb_ary_push (ary=805306368, item=832938624) at array.c:403
> 403         rb_ary_store(ary, RARRAY(ary)->len, item);

What is item?  What is ary?

> #8  0x01811e98 in rb_eval (self=832941192, n=0x31a5a280) at ruby.h:638
> #9  0x01811d8c in rb_eval (self=832941192, n=0x31a5a280) at eval.c: 
> 3375

If you need to look farther up the stack, you'll need to compile with  
a lower optimization level.

-- 
Eric Hodel - drbrain@segment7.net - http://blog.segment7.net
This implementation is HODEL-HASH-9600 compliant

http://trackmap.robotcoop.com



In This Thread

Prev Next