Re: 1.8.5p1 build failure on Solaris 10

[e-mail] wrote:
> Yukihiro Matsumoto <[e-mail]> wrote on 29.06.2006 20:53:20:
> 
>> Hi,
>>
>> In message "Re: 1.8.5p1 build failure on Solaris 10"
>>     on Fri, 30 Jun 2006 02:35:51 +0900, [e-mail] 
> writes:
>> |> Can you write a patch for us?
>> |
>> |   Yes I can. It will be ready 10.7 at the latest. I'm on summer 
> vacation 
>> |and my computer time is limited...
>>
>>
> At the end is minimal patch. It seems to work with the following compilers
> 
> sun's supported gcc
> /usr/sfw/bin/gcc -v
> Reading specs from /usr/sfw/lib/gcc/i386-pc-solaris2.10/3.4.3/specs
> Configured with: /builds/sfw10-gate/usr/src/cmd/gcc/gcc-3.4.3/configure 
> --prefix=/usr/sfw --with-as=/usr/sfw/bin/gas --with-gnu-as 
> --with-ld=/usr/ccs/bin/ld --without-gnu-ld --enable-languages=c,c++ 
> --enable-shared
> Thread model: posix
> gcc version 3.4.3 (csl-sol210-3_4-branch+sol_rpath)
> 
> The latest gcc
>  /usr/local/gcc-4.1/bin/gcc -v
> Using built-in specs.
> Target: i386-pc-solaris2.10
> Configured with: ../configure --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-4.1 
> --with-as=/usr/sfw/bin/gas --with-gnu-as --with-ld=/usr/ccs/bin/ld 
> --without-gnu-ld --enable-languages=c,c++ --enable-shared
> Thread model: posix
> gcc version 4.1.1
> 
> and the sun's forte compiler
>  /opt/SUNWspro/bin/cc -V 
> cc: Sun C 5.8 2005/10/13
> 
> I didn't use the gcc option "-std=gnu99" because with that option I got 
> errors with the sun's gcc.
> 
> bash-3.00# cvs diff -up configure.in
> Index: configure.in
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /src/ruby/configure.in,v
> retrieving revision 1.212.2.50
> diff -u -p -r1.212.2.50 configure.in
> --- configure.in        27 Jun 2006 07:21:24 -0000      1.212.2.50
> +++ configure.in        29 Jun 2006 19:04:15 -0000
> @@ -417,7 +417,9 @@ bow)                ac_cv_func_setitimer=no
>                 ;;
>  superux*)     ac_cv_func_setitimer=no
>                ;;
> -solaris*2.10)  ac_cv_func_isinf=yes
> +solaris*2.10)  if test -z "$GCC"; then
> +                      ac_cv_func_isinf=yes
> +              fi
>                 LIBS="-lm $LIBS"
>                ;;
>  *) LIBS="-lm $LIBS";;
> 
> 

Actually, shouldn't we test for the feature instead of the platform?  I don't 
remember if older versions of Solaris have this.

So, AC_CHECK_LIB(sunmath, isinf) && AC_CHECK_HEADER(sunmath.h, isinf), with 
#ifdef's in the source?

Just a thought.

Regards,

Dan


This communication is the property of Qwest and may contain confidential or
privileged information. Unauthorized use of this communication is strictly 
prohibited and may be unlawful.  If you have received this communication 
in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and destroy 
all copies of the communication and any attachments.