[#7955] Failing tests in ruby since 1.8.2 — "Caleb Tennis" <caleb@...>
The following tests have been failing in Ruby for a long time, including
[#7978] Patch for Unix socket peer credentials — "James F. Hranicky" <jfh@...>
This patch adds support for getting the uid and gid of the peer
In article <200606091528.30171.jfh@cise.ufl.edu>,
On Friday 16 June 2006 11:51, Tanaka Akira wrote:
In article <200606161327.35948.jfh@cise.ufl.edu>,
On Saturday 17 June 2006 06:27, Tanaka Akira wrote:
In article <200607101352.16804.jfh@cise.ufl.edu>,
On Tuesday 11 July 2006 00:10, Tanaka Akira wrote:
Hi,
On Thursday 13 July 2006 22:48, nobu@ruby-lang.org wrote:
On Jul 18, 2006, at 12:27 PM, James F. Hranicky wrote:
On Tuesday 18 July 2006 15:52, Eric Hodel wrote:
[#7994] Ruby Kaigi date confusion — "Charles O Nutter" <headius@...>
I'm quite confused by the dates I have seen reported on various Ruby Kaigi
[#8013] Download page on ruby-lang has numeric URL — Hugh Sasse <hgs@...>
This is off-topic to ruby-core, but possibly core to ruby's uptake:
On Jun 19, 2006, at 3:32 AM, Hugh Sasse wrote:
[#8038] bug in $. ? — Wybo Dekker <wybo@...>
wybo>cat t
Wybo Dekker schrieb:
Pit Capitain wrote:
[#8050] Thank-you to the Rails Core Team — Dave Teare <devlists-ruby-core@...>
While we were listening to Dave Thomas' Keynote address today at
[#8061] Win32 Extension Issues Wanted! — "Austin Ziegler" <halostatue@...>
Everyone. I had a conversation with folks from Microsoft today about
[#8065] Core documentation patches — Alex Young <alex@...>
Hi there,
Hi,
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
[#8073] 1.8.5p1 build failure on Solaris 10 — "Daniel Berger" <Daniel.Berger@...>
Solaris 10
Hi,
Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
>>>>> "D" == Daniel Berger <Daniel.Berger@qwest.com> writes:
ts <decoux@moulon.inra.fr> wrote on 28.06.2006 17:37:00:
Hi,
Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote on 29.06.2006 20:02:11:
Hi,
Yukihiro Matsumoto <matz@ruby-lang.org> wrote on 29.06.2006 20:53:20:
ville.mattila@stonesoft.com wrote:
[#8087] optparse.rb to RDoc documentation patch — <noreply@...>
Patches item #4879, was opened at 2006-06-28 20:50
On Jun 28, 2006, at 11:50 AM, <noreply@rubyforge.org>
[#8102] Reorganizing configure.in by platform? — "Daniel Berger" <Daniel.Berger@...>
Hi,
Re: Possible bug in $?
I needed a good chuckle today. It turns out that the issue is double-quoting
the -e string. My shell is pre-substituting $? as 0.
headius@opteron:~/testrails/test4$ ruby -e 'fork { exit 99 }; Process.wait;
p $?.class'
Process::Status
headius@opteron:~/testrails/test4$ ruby -e "fork { exit 99 }; Process.wait;
p $?.class"
Fixnum
The second one ultimately executes "p 0.class", which obviously displays
Fixnum.
Nevermind!
On 6/26/06, Charles O Nutter <headius@headius.com> wrote:
>
> FYI, my ruby -v:
>
> ruby 1.8.4 (2005-12-24) [x86_64-linux]
>
> On 6/26/06, Charles O Nutter <headius@headius.com> wrote:
> >
> > Why does this print out "Fixnum":
> >
> > ruby -e "fork { exit 99 }; Process.wait; p $?.class"
> >
> > when all docs I can find say that $? should be a Process::Status object
> > (and it appears to be such when running in a script or in IRB)? Is there
> > some special behavior enabled for -e execution and process launches?
> >
> > --
> > Charles Oliver Nutter @ headius.blogspot.com
> > JRuby Developer @ www.jruby.org
> > Application Architect @ www.ventera.com
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Charles Oliver Nutter @ headius.blogspot.com
> JRuby Developer @ www.jruby.org
> Application Architect @ www.ventera.com
>
>
--
Charles Oliver Nutter @ headius.blogspot.com
JRuby Developer @ www.jruby.org
Application Architect @ www.ventera.com