[#74190] [Ruby trunk Feature#12134] Comparison between `true` and `false` — duerst@...
Issue #12134 has been updated by Martin D端rst.
3 messages
2016/03/07
[#74269] Type systems for Ruby — Rob Blanco <ml@...>
Dear ruby-core,
5 messages
2016/03/10
[#74395] [Ruby trunk Feature#12142] Hash tables with open addressing — shyouhei@...
Issue #12142 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.
3 messages
2016/03/17
[ruby-core:74335] [Ruby trunk Feature#12173] `Time#till_now`
From:
eregontp@...
Date:
2016-03-15 08:21:52 UTC
List:
ruby-core #74335
Issue #12173 has been updated by Benoit Daloze.
Tsuyoshi Sawada wrote:
> It is very frequent to have a time instance:
>
> ~~~RUBY
> t = Time.now
> ~~~
>
> and then after some operations, do:
>
> ~~~RUBY
> Time.now - t
> ~~~
This seems fairly related to #8640.
Just a note: the Time.now - t is typically not what you want if you want to benchmark some piece of code.
A monotonic clock like `Process.clock_gettime(Process::CLOCK_MONOTONIC)` should be used instead (I know, it's a bit lengthy).
Or well if you can require 'benchmark' then it's just Benchmark.realtime { ... }.
----------------------------------------
Feature #12173: `Time#till_now`
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/12173#change-57459
* Author: Tsuyoshi Sawada
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee:
----------------------------------------
It is very frequent to have a time instance:
~~~RUBY
t = Time.now
~~~
and then after some operations, do:
~~~RUBY
Time.now - t
~~~
I propose `Time#till_now`, which is equivalent to:
~~~RUBY
class Time
def till_now; self.class.now - self end
end
~~~
and similar methods can perhaps be defined on `Date` and `DateTime` classes as well. Another candidate for the method name is `until_now`.
Then we can do:
~~~RUBY
t = Time.now
# some heavy operation
puts "It took #{t.till_now} secs."
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>