From: Austin Ziegler Date: 2016-03-23T23:05:13-04:00 Subject: [ruby-core:74504] Re: [Ruby trunk Feature#12208] Improve ri command --===============0002989220== Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113f92323b56cd052ec2b862 --001a113f92323b56cd052ec2b862 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable It shouldn=E2=80=99t be too hard to add `ri` support inside irb=E2=80=94pry= already supports this. I=E2=80=99d actually like to see `ri` come with support for = asking about Ruby language constructs, not just the standard library and installed gems. On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 10:20 PM, wrote: > Issue #12208 has been updated by Martin D=C3=BCrst. > > > I think it would be great to somehow integrate the 'do_you_mean' > functionality into ri. > > Also, a bit more interactivity may help. As an example, if I write "ri > each", I get just a concatenation of the doc for many different 'each' > methods. It would be better to get a list, and a way to select a specific > one. > > Also, being able to use something like ri inside irb may be helpful. Mayb= e > that already exists, and I just don't know. > > > ---------------------------------------- > Feature #12208: Improve ri command > https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/12208#change-57623 > > * Author: Yui NARUSE > * Status: Open > * Priority: Normal > * Assignee: > ---------------------------------------- > Ruby has well documented in rdoc. > It also has a frontend CLI. > > But people seems not using `ri`... > > At first, write your request here to improve ri command! > > ---Files-------------------------------- > Sample ri.png (44.7 KB) > > > -- > https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/ > > Unsubscribe: > > --=20 Austin Ziegler =E2=80=A2 halostatue@gmail.com =E2=80=A2 austin@halostatue.c= a http://www.halostatue.ca/ =E2=80=A2 http://twitter.com/halostatue --001a113f92323b56cd052ec2b862 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
It shouldn=E2=80=99t be too hard to add `ri` support insid= e irb=E2=80=94pry already supports this. I=E2=80=99d actually like to see `= ri` come with support for asking about Ruby language constructs, not just t= he standard library and installed gems.
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 10:20 PM, <duers= t@it.aoyama.ac.jp> wrote:
I= ssue #12208 has been updated by Martin D=C3=BCrst.


I think it would be great to somehow integrate the 'do_you_mean' fu= nctionality into ri.

Also, a bit more interactivity may help. As an example, if I write "ri= each", I get just a concatenation of the doc for many different '= each' methods. It would be better to get a list, and a way to select a = specific one.

Also, being able to use something like ri inside irb may be helpful. Maybe = that already exists, and I just don't know.


----------------------------------------
Feature #12208: Improve ri command
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/12208#c= hange-57623

* Author: Yui NARUSE
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee:
----------------------------------------
Ruby has well documented in rdoc.
It also has a frontend CLI.

But people seems not using `ri`...

At first, write your request here to improve ri command!

---Files--------------------------------
Sample ri.png (44.7 KB)


--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

Unsubscribe: <mailto:= ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=3Dunsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/m= ailman/options/ruby-core>



--
=
Austin Ziegler =E2=80=A2 halostatue@gmail.com =E2=80=A2 <= a href=3D"mailto:austin@halostatue.ca" target=3D"_blank">austin@halostatue.= ca
http://ww= w.halostatue.ca/ =E2=80=A2 http://twitter.com/halostatue
--001a113f92323b56cd052ec2b862-- --===============0002989220== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Unsubscribe: --===============0002989220==--