[#74190] [Ruby trunk Feature#12134] Comparison between `true` and `false` — duerst@...
Issue #12134 has been updated by Martin D端rst.
3 messages
2016/03/07
[#74269] Type systems for Ruby — Rob Blanco <ml@...>
Dear ruby-core,
5 messages
2016/03/10
[#74395] [Ruby trunk Feature#12142] Hash tables with open addressing — shyouhei@...
Issue #12142 has been updated by Shyouhei Urabe.
3 messages
2016/03/17
[ruby-core:74241] [Ruby trunk Feature#12161] Friendly BigDecimal#inspect
From:
melentievm@...
Date:
2016-03-09 12:42:06 UTC
List:
ruby-core #74241
Issue #12161 has been reported by Max Melentiev. ---------------------------------------- Feature #12161: Friendly BigDecimal#inspect https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/12161 * Author: Max Melentiev * Status: Open * Priority: Normal * Assignee: ---------------------------------------- Can BigDecimal's #inspect be more human-friendly? Even just `#<BigDecimal:b7ea1130,1234.5678,8(12)>` instead of `#<BigDecimal:b7ea1130,'0.12345678E4',8(12)>` will be much easy to read. But I think the best option is `1234.5678(#<BigDecimal:b7ea1130,8(12)>)` or something alike, which focuses on its numeric nature. I've never used bigdecimal's address and number of significant digits. Maybe if this is rarely used information it can be avoided in #inspect at all. With such formatting It'll be easier to recognise values in repl, debugger, and especially in test's output/failures. -- https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/ Unsubscribe: <mailto:ruby-core-request@ruby-lang.org?subject=unsubscribe> <http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>