[#35961] require performance on 1.9 — Xavier Shay <xavier-list@...>
Hello,
[#35985] [Backport92 - Backport #4641][Open] Please backport r31418 to 1.9.2 stable branch — Aaron Patterson <aaron@...>
[#36013] [Ruby 1.9 - RubySpec #4649][Open] Adding parallel constructors to Ruby 2.0 — Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...>
[#36046] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4655][Open] String#to_c does not support scientific notation — Tinco Andringa <mail@...>
[#36058] draft schedule of Ruby 1.9.3 — "Yuki Sonoda (Yugui)" <yugui@...>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hi Yugui, is there any plans for the next patch release of 1.9.2?
[#36108] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4666][Open] set ruby compatibility version to 1.9.3 in trunk — Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@...>
Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@lucas-nussbaum.net> wrote:
> Even if 1.9.3 is still binary-compatible with 1.9.1, I think that it would be easier to change
2011/5/12 Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org>:
[#36131] Re: [ruby-cvs:38172] Ruby:r30989 (trunk): * include/ruby/win32.h: define WIN32 if neither _WIN64 nor WIN32 defined. it forces to use push/pop for pack(4) pragma. — "Yuki Sonoda (Yugui)" <yugui@...>
Hi arton,
Hi,
[#36150] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4680][Open] [PATCH] io.c: fix busy wait with sendfile() — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
[#36156] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4683][Open] [PATCH] io.c: copy_stream execute interrupts and retry — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
[#36167] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4421] [ext/openssl] Fix RSA public key encoding — Hiroshi NAKAMURA <nakahiro@...>
[#36255] Whitespace conventions? — Steve Klabnik <steve@...>
So, while working on some documentation, I've noticed that there's a lot of
2011/5/17 Steve Klabnik <steve@steveklabnik.com>:
[#36285] unable to load irb, 1.9.3 mingw — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...>
Hello all, with mingw 1.9.3, I get the following when trying to load irb:
[#36314] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #3167] RDoc issues in interactive mode — Benoit Daloze <redmine@...>
[#36316] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4731][Open] ruby -S irb fails with mingw/msys vanilla builds — Roger Pack <rogerpack2005@...>
Hi,
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 7:46 AM, Nobuyoshi Nakada <nobu@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
[#36322] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4734][Assigned] [ext/openssl] DSA#sign error — Martin Bosslet <Martin.Bosslet@...>
[#36337] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #3905] rb_clear_cache_by_class() called often during GC for non-blocking I/O — Akira Tanaka <akr@...>
Akira Tanaka <akr@fsij.org> wrote:
Hi,
SASADA Koichi <ko1@atdot.net> wrote:
[#36373] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4757][Open] Attempt to make Enumerator docs more clear (patch included) — David Copeland <davetron5000@...>
2011/5/25 Yusuke Endoh <mame@tsg.ne.jp>:
[#36374] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4758][Open] yaml file not human readable when saving utf-8 — Ilias Lazaridis <ilias@...>
[#36390] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4766][Open] Range#bsearch — Yusuke Endoh <mame@...>
On Jul 17, 2011, at 7:54 PM, Eric Hodel wrote:
[#36395] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4769][Open] Updated SMTP standards — "J.R. Garcia" <mrjohngarcia@...>
[#36406] 1.8.7 release next month — Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@...>
Hello core people,
2011/5/23 Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org>:
Hi Luis,
From: Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org>
From: Hidetoshi NAGAI <nagai@ai.kyutech.ac.jp>
Ping Luis, how's it going?
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 5:18 AM, Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
Hi,
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 4:30 AM, Hidetoshi NAGAI <nagai@ai.kyutech.ac.jp> wrote:
(06/06/2011 01:16 PM), Luis Lavena wrote:
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 1:24 AM, Urabe Shyouhei <shyouhei@ruby-lang.org> wrote:
From: Luis Lavena <luislavena@gmail.com>
[#36419] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4772][Open] Hash#add_keys — Joey Zhou <yimutang@...>
[#36429] GC thought — Roger Pack <rogerdpack2@...>
Hello all.
[#36447] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4777][Open] Ruby 1.9.2-p180 ignoring INT, TERM, and QUIT until it receives CONT — Nathan Sobo <nathansobo@...>
[#36463] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4778][Open] IO#each_chomped — Joey Zhou <yimutang@...>
[#36474] Error reporting, backtraces and the debugger — Clifford Heath <clifford.heath@...>
Dear people,
[#36479] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4784][Open] Import the JSON library — Lazaridis Ilias <ilias@...>
[#36494] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4786][Open] RCR new Feature: Numeric#grouped — Roger Pack <rogerpack2005@...>
[#36528] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4795][Open] Nested classes don't seem to resolve correctly when another class exists with the same name — John Feminella <johnf@...>
[#36536] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #3924] Performance bug (in require?) — Xavier Shay <xavier-list@...>
[#36550] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4798][Open] test_process and test_signal errors and halts on Windows — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
[#36551] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4799][Open] M17N tests are too JP specific — Luis Lavena <luislavena@...>
[#36558] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #3924] Performance bug (in require?) — Xavier Shay <xavier-list@...>
Hello,
Hello, Xavier
[#36559] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4801][Open] Shorthand Hash Syntax for Strings — Tom Wardrop <tom@...>
Hi,
> Iff 'key': 'value'} means {:key => 'value'} I have no objection.
Hi,
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 04:21:32PM +0900, Yukihiro Matsumoto wrote:
Em 30-05-2011 07:58, Cezary escreveu:
Since :"#{abc}" is allowed in Ruby, I imagine that any such substitute syntax would preserve that property.
Em 30-05-2011 09:05, Michael Edgar escreveu:
On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 09:05:04PM +0900, Michael Edgar wrote:
Cezary:
On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 05:55:39AM +0900, Piotr Szotkowski wrote:
On May 30, 2011, at 10:19 AM, Cezary wrote:
On 5/30/11 9:24 AM, Michael Edgar wrote:
On 02/06/2011, at 10:28 AM, Kurt Stephens wrote:
On 6/1/11 10:17 PM, Bill Kelly wrote:
[#36565] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4803][Open] RCLASS_SUPER won't compile for C extensions as of revision 31627 — Daniel Azuma <dazuma@...>
Hi,
[#36628] [Ruby 1.9 - Feature #4805][Open] Add X509::Name#hash_old for 0.9.X compat — Hiroshi NAKAMURA <nakahiro@...>
[ruby-core:36592] [Ruby 1.9 - Bug #4141] Tk extension is not accepting any type of parameter combination
Issue #4141 has been updated by Luis Lavena. Hidetoshi Nagai, thank you, It is now possible to compile Tcl/Tk with MinGW without issues. I've open a backport request so this get merged back into 1.9.2: http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/4802 On a sidenote I'm going to check if is possible build 1.8.7 out of the repository too, as we aim to provide the same binaries for it. Thank you! ---------------------------------------- Bug #4141: Tk extension is not accepting any type of parameter combination http://redmine.ruby-lang.org/issues/4141 Author: Luis Lavena Status: Closed Priority: Normal Assignee: Hidetoshi Nagai Category: ext Target version: 1.9.x ruby -v: ruby 1.9.3dev (2010-12-09 trunk 30151) [i386-mingw32] =begin Hello, As part of RubyInstaller team, we want to include tk extension in the next release. For that purpose, we built both tcl and tk 8.5.9 and made bin, includes and lib directories available using the standard GCC variables (PATH, CPATH and LIBRARY_PATH) All the existing Ruby extensions (openssl, curses, etc) work with this and properly detect the available headers, except tk extension. Normally, this is the output: <pre> compiling tk check functions......... check struct members.. Use ActiveTcl libraries (if available). Search tclConfig.sh and tkConfig.sh......... Fail to find [tclConfig.sh, tkConfig.sh] Search Tcl library Warning:: cannot find Tcl library. tcltklib will not be compiled (tcltklib is disabled on your Ruby == Ruby/Tk will not work). Please check configure options. Can't find proper Tcl/Tk libraries. So, can't make tcltklib.so which is required by Ruby/Tk. compiling tk/tkutil </pre> To workaround this, I've tried manually provide parameters to Ruby configure process (like --with-tcl-dir, --with-tk-dir, --with-tcllib and --with-tklib), all been marked as warning and no effect in the extension itself. Manually trying to build the extension and provide these parameters: mkdir build cd build ruby ..\extconf.rb --with-tcl-dir=../../tcl --with-tk-dir=../../tk --with-tcllib=tcl85s --with-tklib=tk85s Since tk extension checks for tcl85g, not the static version (as build for RubyInstaller) Generates the following output: <pre> Configure options for Ruby/Tk may be updated. So, delete files which depend on old configs. check functions.checking for ruby_native_thread_p() in ruby.h... yes .checking for rb_errinfo() in ruby.h... yes .checking for rb_safe_level() in ruby.h... yes .checking for rb_hash_lookup() in ruby.h... yes .checking for rb_proc_new() in ruby.h... yes .checking for rb_obj_untrust() in ruby.h... yes .checking for rb_obj_taint() in ruby.h... yes .checking for rb_set_safe_level_force() in ruby.h... yes .checking for rb_sourcefile() in ruby.h... yes check struct members.checking for struct RArray.ptr in ruby.h... no .checking for struct RArray.len in ruby.h... no Use ActiveTcl libraries (if available). Search tclConfig.sh (in ../../tcl/lib) and tkConfig.sh (in ../../tk/lib).. WARNING: found "../../tcl/lib/tclConfig.sh", but cannot find valid Tcl/Tk libraries on the same directory. So, ignore it. WARNING: found "../../tcl/lib/tclconfig.sh", but cannot find valid Tcl/Tk libraries on the same directory. So, ignore it. Fail to find [tclConfig.sh, tkConfig.sh] Search Tcl library.checking for Tcl_FindExecutable() in -ltcl85s... yes Search Tk library.checking for Tk_Init() in -ltk85s... no Warning:: cannot find Tk library. tcltklib will not be compiled (tcltklib is disabled on your Ruby == Ruby/Tk will not work). Please check configure options. Can't find proper Tcl/Tk libraries. So, can't make tcltklib.so which is required by Ruby/Tk. *** ../extconf.rb failed *** </pre> Checking libtk85s.a for symbols (using nm) the Tk_Init symbol is defined. I've tried this way and also using --with-old-extconf, both with similar results. If extconf can't be make compatible with the default build process, what tweak is required for a successful compilation? Thank you. =end -- http://redmine.ruby-lang.org